This research addresses the shared housing market, that is, large-scale developments targeting students and ‘young professionals’, equipped with shared spaces and services for the residents. This housing segment has emerged in response to young adults’ demand for flexible and affordable housing. It has developed in cities that concentrate students and young single professionals, plan densification strategies and face housing commodification. We specifically explore the production side of this market, through the comparison of two projects in Amsterdam. Our objective is to understand the institutional context in which these projects were developed and their outcomes. Consequently, the research questions are: which actors develop these projects, what instruments do they use, and what are the outcomes in a commodifying housing market? From our analysis, the actors need to collaborate on shared housing developments and receive support from local governments, through the strategic use of planning instruments and tenure regulations. However, the shared facilities seem to merely serve to commercialize small housing production, while housing affordability and accessibility are threatened. We, thus, recommend local and national authorities to regulate the provision of shared spaces and suggest further research on the effects of the shared housing market in cities facing housing commodification.

这项研究针对共享住房市场，即针对学生和“年轻专业人员”的大规模开发项目，为居民提供共享空间和服务。该住房领域的出现是为了响应年轻人对灵活，经济适用住房的需求。它在集中学生和年轻单身专业人士，规划致密化策略并面临住房商品化的城市发展。通过比较阿姆斯特丹的两个项目，我们专门研究了该市场的生产方面。我们的目标是了解制定这些项目的机构环境及其结果。因此，研究问题是：哪些参与者开发了这些项目，他们使用什么工具，大宗商品市场的结果如何？根据我们的分析，参与者需要通过战略性使用规划工具和权属条例来共同开发住房并获得地方政府的支持。但是，共享设施似乎仅用于使小型住房生产商业化，同时住房负担能力和可及性受到威胁。因此，我们建议地方和国家当局规范共享空间的提供，并建议进一步研究共享住房市场对面临商品化城市的影响。共享设施似乎仅用于使小型住房生产商业化，同时住房负担能力和可及性受到威胁。因此，我们建议地方和国家当局规范共享空间的提供，并建议进一步研究共享住房市场对面临商品化城市的影响。共享设施似乎仅用于使小型住房生产商业化，同时住房负担能力和可及性受到威胁。因此，我们建议地方和国家当局规范共享空间的提供，并建议进一步研究共享住房市场对面临商品化城市的影响。