This work aims to provide a state-of-the-art review of the performance of combined cycle power plant (CCPP) based on several proposed inlet air cooling systems. Investigators strive to meet the significant need to promote and develop inlet air cooling technologies to recover heat from the wasted energy in the exhaust gasses of the CCPP and diminish the environmental impacts. Various types of cooling systems mainly offer a boost for electric power generation during the peak load hours. The output power of the CCPP directly depends on the mass flow rate of air that flows through the air compressor. Therefore, during extremely hot weather conditions, subsequently, the air density drops, and this leads to a drastic decrease in the power output. This paper reviews available studies investigated the impacts of inlet air cooling systems on the performance of the CCPP. The fogging cooling system contributed by up to 17% in improving the total performance of the CCPP; however, with the use of the evaporative cooling, the performance was enhanced by only 4%. The energy consumption of mechanical chiller compared to that of evaporative cooling is high due to the effectiveness of the evaporative cooler which depends on the humidity of inlet airflow. Further, the mechanical cooling system can provide the CCPP with a cooling effect for around 7-hour on-peak periods. This method increases the gain of the CCPP performance by 13.6%. Ultimately, the CCPP equipped with an absorption chiller demonstrates the best solution to increase the performance by up to 23%.

这项工作旨在根据几种建议的进气冷却系统，对联合循环发电厂（CCPP）的性能进行最新的审查。研究人员努力满足促进和开发进气冷却技术的巨大需求，以从CCPP废气中浪费的能量中回收热量，并减少对环境的影响。各种类型的冷却系统主要为高峰时段的发电提供动力。CCPP的输出功率直接取决于流过空气压缩机的空气的质量流量。因此，在极端炎热的天气条件下，随后，空气密度下降，这导致功率输出的急剧下降。本文回顾了现有研究，研究了进气冷却系统对CCPP性能的影响。雾冷却系统对改善CCPP的整体性能贡献高达17％；但是，通过使用蒸发冷却，性能仅提高了4％。与蒸发冷却相比，机械冷却器的能耗较高，这是因为蒸发冷却器的效率取决于入口气流的湿度。此外，机械冷却系统可以为CCPP提供约7小时高峰时段的冷却效果。此方法将CCPP性能的增益提高了13.6％。最终，配备有吸收式冷却器的CCPP展示了将性能提高多达23％的最佳解决方案。雾冷却系统对改善CCPP的整体性能贡献高达17％；但是，通过使用蒸发冷却，性能仅提高了4％。与蒸发冷却相比，机械冷却器的能耗较高，这是因为蒸发冷却器的效率取决于入口气流的湿度。此外，机械冷却系统可以为CCPP提供约7小时高峰时段的冷却效果。此方法将CCPP性能的增益提高了13.6％。最终，配备有吸收式冷却器的CCPP展示了将性能提高多达23％的最佳解决方案。雾冷却系统对改善CCPP的整体性能贡献高达17％；但是，通过使用蒸发冷却，性能仅提高了4％。与蒸发冷却相比，机械冷却器的能耗较高，这是因为蒸发冷却器的效率取决于入口气流的湿度。此外，机械冷却系统可以为CCPP提供约7小时高峰时段的冷却效果。此方法将CCPP性能的增益提高了13.6％。最终，配备有吸收式冷却器的CCPP展示了将性能提高多达23％的最佳解决方案。与蒸发冷却相比，机械冷却器的能耗较高，这是因为蒸发冷却器的效率取决于入口气流的湿度。此外，机械冷却系统可以为CCPP提供约7小时高峰时段的冷却效果。此方法将CCPP性能的增益提高了13.6％。最终，配备有吸收式冷却器的CCPP展示了将性能提高多达23％的最佳解决方案。与蒸发冷却相比，机械冷却器的能耗较高，这是因为蒸发冷却器的效率取决于入口气流的湿度。此外，机械冷却系统可以为CCPP提供约7小时高峰时段的冷却效果。此方法将CCPP性能的增益提高了13.6％。最终，配备有吸收式冷却器的CCPP展示了将性能提高多达23％的最佳解决方案。此方法将CCPP性能的增益提高了13.6％。最终，配备有吸收式冷却器的CCPP展示了将性能提高多达23％的最佳解决方案。此方法将CCPP性能的增益提高了13.6％。最终，配备有吸收式冷却器的CCPP展示了将性能提高多达23％的最佳解决方案。