This paper traces the reception of the Belmont Report in Europe and its influence on the development of European research ethics thinking and European research ethics systems. It is very difficult to trace a clear, linear reception history because it is difficult to disentangle the influence of the Report from the influence of concurrent developments, such as the 1975 revision of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and the requirement for research ethics review in the Vancouver Group's 1978 "Uniform Requirements for Manuscript Submission." The Report's insistence that the focus of research ethics should be the rights and interests of the individual research subject, and the use of an ethical framework and not ethical theory as the basis of analysis and justification of recommendations, were nevertheless very important for the development of research ethics. The divergence between Europe and the US in the governance of non-biomedical research can at least partly be explained by the absence of strong drivers for the introduction of research ethics committees outside of biomedicine in Europe, and by the ability of non-biomedical researchers to mobilize effectively against the introduction of such committees.

中文翻译：

---

贝尔蒙特在欧洲：主要是间接影响

本文追溯了贝尔蒙报告在欧洲的接受及其对欧洲研究伦理思想和欧洲研究伦理体系发展的影响。很难追溯清晰、线性的接收历史，因为很难将报告的影响与同时发展的影响分开，例如 1975 年修订的赫尔辛基世界医学协会宣言和研究伦理审查的要求在温哥华集团 1978 年的“稿件提交统一要求”中。报告坚持研究伦理的重点应该是个体研究对象的权益，并使用伦理框架而不是伦理理论作为分析和推荐理由的基础，然而，对于研究伦理的发展非常重要。欧洲和美国在非生物医学研究治理方面的分歧至少可以部分地解释为缺乏在欧洲引入生物医学以外的研究伦理委员会的强大驱动力，以及非生物医学研究人员的能力有效动员起来反对设立此类委员会。