People generally respond to resource scarcity through one of two pathways: scarcity-reduction or control-restoration. We draw from recent work on the solidity (versus liquidity) of consumption opportunities to offer a new lens through which to view how the two pathways that follow from resource scarcity relate to object attachment. In this review, we discuss when each pathway predicts stronger (versus weaker) object attachment. We also offer several open questions for when resource scarcity might prompt consumers to forgo the security afforded by stronger attachments for the flexibility afforded by weaker attachments.

中文翻译：

---

理解资源稀缺与对象依附之间的关系

人们通常通过以下两种途径之一来应对资源稀缺：减少稀缺或控制恢复。我们从最近关于消费机会的稳固性（相对于流动性）的工作中汲取灵感，提供了一个新的视角，通过它来观察资源稀缺性所遵​​循的两种途径与对象依恋之间的关系。在这篇评论中，我们讨论了每个途径何时预测更强（相对于更弱）的对象依恋。我们还提供了几个悬而未决的问题，即资源稀缺何时可能促使消费者放弃较强附件提供的安全性，转而使用较弱附件提供的灵活性。