ABSTRACT

Concerns with protecting privacy, especially of online data, has been a goal of privacy scholarship for years. Because most data are transferred online, many instruments focus on online environments. However, when privacy is invaded and data mishandled, the consequences, including the emotional ramifications, extend beyond the online space and into the offline world. Thus, we developed the CPIP, a measure of privacy concern. We were able to (1) determine the top four domains for informational privacy and (2) correlate that concern with emotional outcomes showing people with high concerns felt less calm, less at ease, and angrier, after reading prompts about the right to privacy protection. The CPIP predicts who experiences an emotional reaction to a loss of privacy and steps for Internet providers collecting data online to create a better balance for users and their privacy. This alignment (or misalignment) of attitudes and behaviors challenge the privacy paradox.

摘要

多年来，保护隐私（尤其是在线数据）的隐私一直是隐私奖学金的目标。由于大多数数据都是在线传输的，因此许多仪器都专注于在线环境。但是，当侵犯隐私和数据处理不当时，后果（包括情感后果）将扩展到在线空间之外，并扩展到离线世界。因此，我们开发了CPIP（一种衡量隐私的措施）。我们能够（1）确定信息隐私的前四个领域，并且（2）将关注与情绪结果相关联，显示关注度高的人在阅读了有关隐私保护权的提示后感到不那么平静，不那么放松和愤怒。CPIP可以预测谁会对隐私的丢失产生情感上的反应，并采取措施使互联网提供商在线收集数据，以更好地平衡用户及其隐私。态度和行为的这种一致（或错位）挑战了隐私悖论。