当前位置: X-MOL 学术Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparative assessment of renewable energy-based hydrogen production methods
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews ( IF 16.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-08-13 , DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110192
H. Ishaq , I. Dincer

Hydrogen is acknowledged as a potential fuel as it can be used as an energy carrier, a storage medium, in fuel cells and as a fuel as well and offers carbon-free solutions. This paper investigates three renewable energy based configurations for hydrogen production. The renewable energy sources considered in this study are solar PV, geothermal power generation and biomass gasification. The proposed study also presents a novel configuration of biomass gasification for hydrogen production via multistage water gas shift reactors. The solar PV and geothermal energy based hydrogen production systems are analysed employing the EES software while the hydrogen production system employing biomass gasification is simulated employing Aspen Plus. All three designed configurations are proceeded through numerous parametric analyses to investigate the system behavior and effect on system efficiencies. The hydrogen production using biomass gasification technique provides with the energetic and exergetic efficiencies of 53.6% and 49.8% and the efficiencies for the geothermal power generation based hydrogen production system are found to be 10.4% and 10.2% respectively. The exergetic and energetic efficiencies of hydrogen production system employing solar PV system are found to be 17.45% and 16.95%, respectively and the system is designed to produce 1.13 mol/s of hydrogen. Furthermore, the results of the parametric studies and sensitivity analyses are presented and discussed.



中文翻译:

可再生能源制氢方法的比较评估

氢被认为是潜在的燃料,因为它可以用作能量载体,存储介质,燃料电池中的燃料以及燃料,并提供无碳解决方案。本文研究了三种用于氢气生产的可再生能源配置。本研究中考虑的可再生能源是太阳能光伏,地热发电和生物质气化。拟议的研究还提出了通过多级水煤气变换反应器生产氢气的生物质气化的新配置。使用EES软件分析了基于太阳能光伏和地热能的制氢系统,同时使用Aspen Plus模拟了利用生物质气化的制氢系统。所有这三种设计的配置都通过大量的参数分析来进行,以研究系统行为和对系统效率的影响。使用生物质气化技术的制氢提供了53.6%和49.8%的能量效率和能量效率,并且基于地热发电的制氢系统的效率分别为10.4%和10.2%。发现采用太阳能光伏系统的制氢系统的能效和能效分别为17.45%和16.95%,该系统设计为能产生1.13 mol / s的氢。此外,提出并讨论了参数研究和敏感性分析的结果。使用生物质气化技术的制氢提供了53.6%和49.8%的能量效率和能量效率,并且基于地热发电的制氢系统的效率分别为10.4%和10.2%。发现采用太阳能光伏系统的制氢系统的能效和能效分别为17.45%和16.95%,该系统设计为能产生1.13 mol / s的氢。此外,提出并讨论了参数研究和敏感性分析的结果。使用生物质气化技术的制氢提供了53.6%和49.8%的能量效率和能量效率,并且基于地热发电的制氢系统的效率分别为10.4%和10.2%。发现采用太阳能光伏系统的制氢系统的能效和能效分别为17.45%和16.95%,该系统设计为能产生1.13 mol / s的氢。此外,提出并讨论了参数研究和敏感性分析的结果。发现采用太阳能光伏系统的制氢系统的能效和能效分别为17.45%和16.95%,该系统设计为能产生1.13 mol / s的氢。此外,提出并讨论了参数研究和敏感性分析的结果。发现采用太阳能光伏系统的制氢系统的能效和能效分别为17.45%和16.95%,该系统设计为能产生1.13 mol / s的氢。此外,提出并讨论了参数研究和敏感性分析的结果。

更新日期:2020-08-14
down
wechat
bug