当前位置: X-MOL 学术Brain Stimul. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Incorrect calculation of total electrical energy delivered by a deep brain stimulator
Brain Stimulation ( IF 7.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.07.020
Mark D McAuley 1
Affiliation  

Modern deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices typically enable the programmer of the device to specify the pulse amplitude, the number of pulses delivered per second and the duration of each pulse e i.e. current, frequency and pulse width, respectively. Some devices also enable considerable control over the administration of the electric charge, via accurately-powered segmented electrodes. A DBS programmer may also consider the total electrical energy delivered (TEED) per second by such a device. TEED (1s) was used in 2002 by Moro et al. [1], and subsequently modified in a 2005 letter by Koss et al. [2]. Koss and colleagues provided a mathematical derivation concluding:

中文翻译:

脑深部刺激器输送的总电能计算不正确

现代深部脑刺激 (DBS) 设备通常使设备的程序员能够指定脉冲幅度、每秒传送的脉冲数和每个脉冲的持续时间,即分别是电流、频率和脉冲宽度。一些设备还可以通过精确供电的分段电极对电荷的管理进行相当大的控制。DBS 程序员还可以考虑这种设备每秒传输的总电能 (TEED)。Moro 等人于 2002 年使用了 TEED (1s)。[1],随后在 Koss 等人 2005 年的一封信中进行了修改。[2]。Koss 及其同事提供了一个数学推导得出的结论:
更新日期:2020-09-01
down
wechat
bug