A recent issue of Topics in Cognitive Science featured 11 thoughtful commentaries responding to our article “What happened to cognitive science?” (Núñez et al., 2019). Here, we identify several themes that arose in those commentaries and respond to each. Crucial to understanding our original article is the fundamental distinction between multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary endeavors: Cognitive science began (and has stayed) as multidisciplinary but has failed to move on to form a cohesive interdisciplinary field. We clarify and elaborate our original argument and reiterate the importance of a data‐driven evaluation of the current status of the field, which exhibits a marked disciplinary imbalance, a lack of a coherent conceptual core, and a striking absence of a consistent curriculum in the institutions that grant degrees in this domain. Half a century after the creation of cognitive science, it may now be a good time to revisit goals and visions for how to best approach the ever‐fascinating scientific study of the mind(s).

中文翻译：

---

对于科学，它们是A-Changin'：对Núñez等人的评论（2019年）的回应：“认知科学发生了什么？”

最新一期认知科学专题精选了11条周到的评论，以回应我们的文章“认知科学发生了什么？” （Núñez等人，2019）。在这里，我们确定了那些评论中出现的几个主题，并对每个主题做出回应。理解我们的原始文章至关重要的是多学科和跨学科研究之间的根本区别：认知科学作为多学科开始（并一直存在），但是未能继续发展成为一个有凝聚力的跨学科领域。我们澄清并阐述了我们的原始论点，并重申了以数据为依据的评估该领域当前状况的重要性，该评估表现出明显的学科失衡，缺乏连贯的概念核心以及在课程中显着缺乏一致的课程授予该领域学位的院校。