当前位置: X-MOL 学术Psychological Assessment › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Assessing sluggish cognitive tempo and ADHD inattention in elementary students: Empirical differentiation, invariance across sex and grade, and measurement precision.
Psychological Assessment ( IF 3.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-07-30 , DOI: 10.1037/pas0000946
Stephen P Becker 1 , Kandace W Mossing 1 , Allison K Zoromski 1 , Aaron J Vaughn 1 , Jeffery N Epstein 1 , Leanne Tamm 1 , G Leonard Burns 1
Affiliation  

To advance the research examining the sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) construct, a key priority has been to develop assessment tools that are reliable and valid. The current study builds upon existing work by conducting the most thorough psychometric evaluation to date of the teacher-reported Child and Adolescent Behavior Inventory (CABI) SCT and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder inattention (ADHD-IN) modules in a large sample of elementary students. Participants were 7,613 students (Grades 2-5; 50.3% boys) attending 24 elementary schools in 3 school districts. Teachers (N = 398) provided ratings of SCT, ADHD-IN, academic impairment, and social impairment. An a priori 2-factor model with cross-loadings found the SCT items to demonstrate excellent structural validity with ADHD-IN items. The measurement properties of the SCT and ADHD-IN constructs were also invariant across sex and grade. SCT and ADHD-IN were both uniquely associated with academic and social impairment. Graded response item response theory analysis indicated that the SCT and ADHD-IN scales provided a high level of information and precision. The current study replicates and extends previous research and provides the strongest psychometric evidence to date of teacher-rated SCT using the CABI. The teacher-report CABI may be especially useful in the school-based screening of SCT and ADHD-IN. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译:

评估小学生缓慢的认知节奏和注意力缺陷多动障碍:经验差异、跨性别和年级的不变性以及测量精度。

为了推进对迟缓认知节奏 (SCT) 结构的研究,一个关键的优先事项是开发可靠和有效的评估工具。目前的研究建立在现有工作的基础上,对教师报告的儿童和青少年行为量表 (CABI) SCT 和注意力缺陷/多动障碍注意力不集中 (ADHD-IN) 模块进行了迄今为止最彻底的心理测量评估,在大量小学样本中学生们。参与者是 7,613 名学生(2-5 年级;50.3% 的男孩)就读于 3 个学区的 24 所小学。教师 (N = 398) 提供了 SCT、ADHD-IN、学业障碍和社交障碍的评级。具有交叉载荷的先验 2 因素模型发现 SCT 项目对 ADHD-IN 项目表现出出色的结构有效性。SCT 和 ADHD-IN 结构的测量特性在性别和年级之间也是不变的。SCT 和 ADHD-IN 都与学业和社交障碍有关。分级反应项目反应理论分析表明,SCT 和 ADHD-IN 量表提供了高水平的信息和精确度。当前的研究复制并扩展了以前的研究,并提供了迄今为止使用 CABI 进行教师评级的 SCT 的最强有力的心理测量证据。教师报告 CABI 可能对 SCT 和 ADHD-IN 的学校筛查特别有用。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2020 APA,保留所有权利)。分级反应项目反应理论分析表明,SCT 和 ADHD-IN 量表提供了高水平的信息和精确度。当前的研究复制并扩展了以前的研究,并提供了迄今为止使用 CABI 进行教师评级的 SCT 的最强有力的心理测量证据。教师报告 CABI 可能对 SCT 和 ADHD-IN 的学校筛查特别有用。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2020 APA,保留所有权利)。分级反应项目反应理论分析表明,SCT 和 ADHD-IN 量表提供了高水平的信息和精确度。当前的研究复制并扩展了以前的研究,并提供了迄今为止使用 CABI 进行教师评级的 SCT 的最强有力的心理测量证据。教师报告 CABI 可能对 SCT 和 ADHD-IN 的学校筛查特别有用。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2020 APA,保留所有权利)。
更新日期:2020-07-30
down
wechat
bug