ABSTRACT The construct of perfectionism has been argued to consist of two factors, perfectionistic concerns and perfectionistic strivings. Though perfectionistic concerns are consistently associated with adverse outcomes, the evidence for perfectionistic strivings is mixed. Item cross-loadings of the two-factor model of perfectionism raise questions about whether the two factors assess both common and distinct aspects of perfectionism. The present study aimed to clarify the structure of the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale and the Clinical Perfectionism Scale, by comparing single-factor, two-factor, and bifactor models in a community sample (N = 397). Findings provided greater support for the bifactor model, relative to the two-factor or one-factor models, for the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale and the Clinical Perfectionism Scale. In each bifactor model, the general factor was positively associated with symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress, while the perfectionistic strivings group factor was negatively associated with depression. Results suggest the bifactor model best represents the structure of perfectionism and provide additional support for the use of a general factor score in clinical treatment and research examining perfectionism.

中文翻译：

---

一个因素？两个因素？双因素？Frost多维量表和临床完美主义问卷的心理测量评估

摘要 完美主义的结构被认为包括两个因素，完美主义的关注和完美主义的努力。尽管完美主义的担忧始终与不良结果相关，但完美主义努力的证据却是喜忧参半。完美主义双因素模型的项目交叉加载提出了关于这两个因素是否评估完美主义的共同和不同方面的问题。本研究旨在通过比较社区样本（N = 397）中的单因素、双因素和双因素模型，阐明 Frost 多维完美主义量表和临床完美主义量表的结构。与双因素或单因素模型相比，研究结果为双因素模型提供了更大的支持，Frost 多维完美主义量表和临床完美主义量表。在每个双因素模型中，一般因素与抑郁、焦虑和压力症状呈正相关，而追求完美的群体因素与抑郁症状呈负相关。结果表明双因素模型最能代表完美主义的结构，并为在临床治疗和研究完美主义的临床治疗和研究中使用一般因素评分提供了额外的支持。