McCrae (2020) argues that it is premature to explore interventions focused on personality change. In his commentary, he suggests that interventions should be promoted only if their effects in self-report data are confirmed by the additional opinion of informants. We agree with the essence of his position and would go further by envisioning a new framework for rigorous collaborative research on personality change (Bleidorn et al., 2020). We nevertheless maintain that policymakers would benefit from considering the additional opinion of personality scientists. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

为什么止步于两种意见？回复麦克雷 (2020)。

McCrae (2020) 认为，探索专注于人格改变的干预措施还为时过早。在他的评论中，他建议只有当他们在自我报告数据中的影响被知情人的额外意见证实时，才应该促进干预。我们同意他的立场的本质，并将通过设想一个新的框架来进行更深入的个性改变合作研究（Bleidorn 等，2020）。尽管如此，我们仍然认为决策者将从考虑人格科学家的额外意见中受益。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2020 APA，保留所有权利）。