BACKGROUND Starting from the Demands-Resources model, our aims through this diary research were to explore daily diary fluctuations in work engagement in a sample of teachers and to look for the effects of that on affect and satisfaction at home. METHOD Several Latent Growth Curve (LCGA) models were run on two dimensions of work engagement (vigor and dedication) with an exploratory focus, to look for different grouped oscillation patterns. Then, several repeated measures MANCOVA explored whether those patterns were related to affect and satisfaction at night. RESULTS Two distinct latent trajectories were found for work engagement dimensions. However, neither of them showed any notable development over time. Furthermore, our latent classes were found to be related to inter-individual differences in positive and negative affect, and the satisfaction at home domain, but no interesting within-subjects (overall time) effects were found. CONCLUSIONS Contrary to our expectations, we provide some evidence of the stability of work engagement over the working week. In addition, following previous results, work engagement levels across the working week were found to be related to levels of affect and satisfaction at home, adding evidence to the spillover potential of work engagement on individuals' key personal resources.

中文翻译：

---

探索教师日常工作参与模式：潜在增长建模方法。

背景从需求-资源模型开始，我们通过日记研究的目的是探索教师样本中日常工作投入的日记波动，并寻找其对家庭情感和满意度的影响。方法 几个潜在增长曲线 (LCGA) 模型在工作投入（活力和奉献）的两个维度上运行，并具有探索性，以寻找不同的分组振荡模式。然后，MANCOVA 多次重复测量这些模式是否与夜间的情绪和满意度有关。结果 在工作投入维度上发现了两个不同的潜在轨迹。然而，随着时间的推移，它们都没有表现出任何显着的发展。此外，我们发现我们的潜在类别与正面和负面影响的个体差异有关，和在家庭领域的满意度，但没有发现有趣的受试者内（总时间）效应。结论 与我们的预期相反，我们提供了一些关于工作周内工作投入稳定性的证据。此外，根据之前的结果，发现整个工作周的工作投入水平与家庭的情感和满意度水平相关，这为工作投入对个人关键个人资源的溢出潜力提供了证据。