We conducted a systematic scoping review to map the available evidence on smoke-free or tobacco-free (SF/TF) university policies globally. We specifically looked at (i) how policies were developed and communicated and (ii) what indicators were used to evaluate their impact. We searched for peer-reviewed literature, published up to January 2020, across 10 multi-disciplinary databases. We followed a duplicate, independent data selection, and charting process. We inductively categorized the studies according to the research design and objective of 'process' and 'impact evaluation'. We identified 75 unique studies across 23 countries conducted between 1993 and 2019. Most studies were conducted in the United States (46/75, 61.3%), were based on quantitative research design and focused on impact evaluations; a third (n = 28) reported both process and impact evaluations (37.3%). Community engagement and multi-channel communication strategies were mostly used to disseminate SF/TF policies. The impact was determined by a wide range of indicators for knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to policies. There is a mature, relevant body of literature describing the development and evaluation of SF/TF policies in universities. Future reviews could quantify the impact of the bans and may consider process indicators as moderating factors to explain the potential heterogeneity of results.

中文翻译：

---

在大学环境中制定和评估无烟或无烟政策：系统的范围界定审查。

我们进行了系统的范围界定审查，以映射有关全球无烟或无烟（SF / TF）大学政策的现有证据。我们专门研究了（i）如何制定和传达政策以及（ii）使用了哪些指标来评估其影响。我们搜索了2020年1月之前发布的，经过同行评审的10个多学科数据库中的文献。我们遵循了重复的，独立的数据选择和制图过程。我们根据研究设计和“过程”和“影响评估”的目标对研究进行归纳归类。我们确定了1993年至2019年之间在23个国家/地区进行的75项独特研究。大多数研究是在美国进行的（46/75，占61.3％），这些研究是基于定量研究设计并着重于影响评估的；三分之一（n = 28）报告了过程和影响评估（37.3％）。社区参与和多渠道沟通策略主要用于传播SF / TF政策。影响是由与政策相关的知识，态度和行为的广泛指标确定的。有成熟，相关的文献描述了大学的SF / TF政策的发展和评估。未来的审查可以量化禁令的影响，并可以将过程指标视为调节因素，以解释结果的潜在异质性。有成熟，相关的文献描述了大学的SF / TF政策的发展和评估。未来的审查可以量化禁令的影响，并可以将过程指标视为调节因素，以解释结果的潜在异质性。有成熟，相关的文献描述了大学的SF / TF政策的发展和评估。未来的审查可以量化禁令的影响，并可以将过程指标视为调节因素，以解释结果的潜在异质性。