当前位置: X-MOL 学术Crisis › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Searching Online for Methods of Suicide.
Crisis ( IF 1.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-07-16 , DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000701
Christian Ulrich Eriksen 1, 2 , Flemming Konradsen 1 , Thilde Vildekilde 1
Affiliation  

Background: Information on methods of suicide is available online, and access to information on methods of suicide appears to contribute to a small but significant proportion of suicides. There is limited documentation of how methods of suicide are being profiled, as well as what content exists in other languages than English. Aim: We aimed to analyze and compare how methods of suicide are profiled on Danish and English-language websites. Method: We applied a categorization and content analysis of websites describing methods of suicide. Sites were retrieved by applying widely used Danish and English-language search terms. Results: A total of 136 English-language websites and 106 Danish-language websites were included for analysis. Websites were more often categorized as prevention or support sites, academic or policy sites, and against suicide sites than dedicated suicide sites (i.e., pro-suicide sites), or information sites. However, information on methods of suicide was available, and 20.1% and 8.9% of the English and Danish-language sites, respectively, suggested that a particular method of suicide was quick, easy, painless, or certain to result in death. Limitations: Only one author coded and analyzed all websites. A further operationalization of the content analysis checklist is warranted to increase reliability. Conclusion: The websites primarily had a prevention or anti-suicide focus, but information on methods of suicide was available, requiring an increased focus on how to diminish the negative effects of harmful online content.

中文翻译:

在线搜索自杀方法。

背景:有关自杀方法的信息可在线获取,并且获取有关自杀方法的信息似乎是导致自杀的一小部分但很重要的原因。关于如何描述自杀方法以及用英语以外的其他语言存在的内容的文件有限。目标:我们旨在分析和比较丹麦语和英语网站上如何描述自杀方法。方法:我们对描述自杀方法的网站进行了分类和内容分析。通过应用广泛使用的丹麦语和英语搜索词检索站点。结果:共有 136 个英语网站和 106 个丹麦语网站被纳入分析。网站更多地被归类为预防或支持网站、学术或政策网站、和反对自杀网站而不是专门的自杀网站(即支持自杀的网站)或信息网站。然而,关于自杀方法的信息是可用的,分别有 20.1% 和 8.9% 的英语和丹麦语网站表示特定的自杀方法快速、简单、无痛或肯定会导致死亡。限制:只有一位作者对所有网站进行编码和分析。内容分析清单的进一步操作是保证以提高可靠性。结论:这些网站主要以预防或反自杀为重点,但可以获得有关自杀方法的信息,因此需要更加关注如何减少有害在线内容的负面影响。关于自杀方法的信息是可用的,分别有 20.1% 和 8.9% 的英语和丹麦语网站表示特定的自杀方法快速、简单、无痛或肯定会导致死亡。限制:只有一位作者对所有网站进行编码和分析。内容分析清单的进一步操作是保证以提高可靠性。结论:这些网站主要以预防或反自杀为重点,但可以获得有关自杀方法的信息,因此需要更加关注如何减少有害在线内容的负面影响。关于自杀方法的信息是可用的,分别有 20.1% 和 8.9% 的英语和丹麦语网站表示特定的自杀方法快速、简单、无痛或肯定会导致死亡。限制:只有一位作者对所有网站进行编码和分析。内容分析清单的进一步操作是保证以提高可靠性。结论:这些网站主要以预防或反自杀为重点,但可以获得有关自杀方法的信息,因此需要更加关注如何减少有害在线内容的负面影响。只有一位作者对所有网站进行了编码和分析。内容分析清单的进一步操作是保证以提高可靠性。结论:这些网站主要以预防或反自杀为重点,但可以获得有关自杀方法的信息,因此需要更加关注如何减少有害在线内容的负面影响。只有一位作者对所有网站进行了编码和分析。内容分析清单的进一步操作是保证以提高可靠性。结论:这些网站主要以预防或反自杀为重点,但可以获得有关自杀方法的信息,因此需要更加关注如何减少有害在线内容的负面影响。
更新日期:2020-07-16
down
wechat
bug