Despite extensive research demonstrating the effect of temporal context on time perception, its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. One influential proposal to explain the temporal context effect is McAuley and Jones' (2003) framework that incorporates 2 classic timing models, interval and entrainment models. They demonstrated that listeners' duration estimates were shifted from reality in opposite directions when to-be-judged durations occurred earlier versus later than an expected beat, which is predicted by their entrainment models. However, it is unclear about how long the entrainment lasts after the cessation of external stimulation. Here, we investigated the persistence of the entrainment effect in 2 experiments. In Experiment 1, we found that entrainment models predict the behaviors better after short delays (2 beats), while interval models predict better after long delays (4 beats). In Experiment 2, we extended the finding to a faster tempo and added 1 more delay length. Again, we found that entrainment was strongest after short delays (2 beats), while disappeared after medium (4 beats) and long delays (8 beats). Our findings suggest an interplay between entrainment and interval timings as a function of delays between successive events. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

间隔模型和夹带模型在持续时间感知中的相互作用。

尽管广泛的研究证明了时间背景对时间感知的影响，但其潜在机制仍然知之甚少。解释时间上下文效应的一项有影响力的提议是 McAuley 和 Jones (2003) 的框架，该框架结合了 2 个经典时间模型、间隔和夹带模型。他们证明，当要判断的持续时间发生早于或晚于预期节拍（由他们的夹带模型预测）时，听众的持续时间估计会从相反的方向偏离现实。然而，尚不清楚外部刺激停止后夹带持续多长时间。在这里，我们研究了 2 个实验中夹带效应的持久性。在实验 1 中，我们发现夹带模型在短暂延迟（2 次节拍）后更好地预测行为，而间隔模型在长时间延迟（4 次节拍）后预测效果更好。在实验 2 中，我们将发现扩展到更快的速度，并增加了 1 个延迟长度。再次，我们发现夹带在短延迟（2 拍）后最强，而在中等（4 拍）和长延迟（8 拍）后消失。我们的研究结果表明，作为连续事件之间延迟的函数，夹带和间隔时间之间存在相互作用。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2020 APA，保留所有权利）。我们的研究结果表明，作为连续事件之间延迟的函数，夹带和间隔时间之间存在相互作用。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2020 APA，保留所有权利）。我们的研究结果表明，作为连续事件之间延迟的函数，夹带和间隔时间之间存在相互作用。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2020 APA，保留所有权利）。