OBJECTIVES We conducted two complementary scoping reviews to (1) identify instruments that assess experience and outcomes of custom ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) care in persons with neurologic and traumatic conditions and (2) determine to what extent they might be psychometrically sound for AFO users. A stakeholder Advisory Committee considered to what extent the identified and psychometrically sound instruments might be feasible for use in developing quality measures for custom AFO users. DATA SOURCES Both scoping reviews: PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Cochrane Systematic Reviews. First scoping review only: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). STUDY SELECTION The initial scoping review yielded 79 articles with 82 instruments, 16 of which were used in four or more studies. The second scoping review yielded 57 articles reporting psychometric properties. DATA EXTRACTION Most instruments assessed activity (specifically mobility) and pertained to the National Quality Forum domain of "Health-Related Quality of Life." The 10m Walk Test, 6 Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go, and Rivermead Mobility Index were reported to have adequate reliability and validity, and were considered feasible for administration in a clinical setting. CONCLUSIONS Complementary scoping reviews demonstrated that some instruments with reasonable psychometric properties are available that are feasible to use in developing quality measures for custom AFO care. However, experience of care instruments suitable for this population were not identified but are needed for a comprehensive evaluation of care quality for AFO users.

中文翻译：

---

确定用于评估定制踝足矫形器个人护理质量的仪器：范围审查

目标 我们进行了两项互补的范围界定审查，以 (1) 确定评估定制踝足矫形器 (AFO) 对神经系统和创伤患者的体验和结果的工具，以及 (2) 确定它们在心理测量上对 AFO 的合理程度用户。利益相关者咨询委员会考虑了在多大程度上确定的和心理测量学上合理的工具可用于为自定义 AFO 用户制定质量措施。数据来源 两个范围综述：PubMed、护理和相关健康文献累积索引 (CINAHL)、Embase、Cochrane Systematic Reviews。仅限第一次范围审查：Cochrane 对照试验中央登记册、物理治疗证据数据库 (PEDro)。研究选择 最初的范围审查产生了 79 篇文章和 82 种工具，其中 16 项用于四项或更多研究。第二次范围界定审查产生了 57 篇报告心理测量特性的文章。数据提取 大多数工具评估活动（特别是流动性）并与“与健康相关的生活质量”的国家质量论坛领域有关。10m 步行测试、6 分钟步行测试、Berg 平衡量表、Timed Up and Go 和 Rivermead Mobility Index 被报告具有足够的可靠性和有效性，并且被认为在临床环境中是可行的。结论 补充范围审查表明，一些具有合理心理测量特性的工具可用于开发定制 AFO 护理的质量措施。然而，