当前位置: X-MOL 学术Trans. GIS › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparison of versioning methods to improve the information flow in the planning and building processes
Transactions in GIS ( IF 2.1 ) Pub Date : 2020-08-06 , DOI: 10.1111/tgis.12672
Helen Eriksson 1, 2 , Jing Sun 3 , Väino Tarandi 3 , Lars Harrie 2
Affiliation  

Version management is a prerequisite for digital information flow between phases in the planning and building processes. Information evolves over time and many parties retrieve information from the various phases. The aim of this article is to evaluate versioning methods, focusing on geodata buildings in the 3D cadastre process. The main attention in the evaluation is on the comprehensive ISO standard Product Lifecycle Support (PLCS). PLCS is evaluated against two simpler versioning methods, the versioning in CityGML 3.0 and a modified Git versioning method implemented in CityJSON. CityGML 3.0 fulfils all but one requirement and PLCS meets all. The methods vary in complexity; the Git proposal is a simple solution, easy to implement and maintain, while PLCS includes all functionalities and is complex to implement. There is a trade‐off between number of functionalities and complexity, it is therefore important that the intended purpose determines the choice of versioning method.

中文翻译:

比较版本控制方法以改善计划和构建过程中的信息流

版本管理是数字信息在计划和构建过程的各个阶段之间流动的前提。信息随着时间的推移而发展,许多参与者从各个阶段检索信息。本文的目的是评估版本控制方法,重点关注3D地籍过程中的地理数据建筑物。评估中的主要重点是全面的ISO标准产品生命周期支持(PLCS)。针对两种更简单的版本控制方法对PLCS进行了评估,分别是CityGML 3.0中的版本控制和在CityJSON中实现的修改后的Git版本控制方法。CityGML 3.0满足了所有需求,而PLCS却满足了所有需求。方法的复杂性各不相同;Git提案是一个简单的解决方案,易于实现和维护,而PLCS包含所有功能并且实现起来很复杂。
更新日期:2020-08-06
down
wechat
bug