We noticed a few minor errors in Table S2 in the supplement of the original manuscript, as summarized below. (1) The error for the ¹⁴N/¹⁵N ratio of grain M2‐A4‐G27 should be 0.2 instead of 0.3. (2) The δ³⁰Si value of grain M1‐A5‐G1112 should be 16 instead of 19. (3) The names of grains M2‐A1‐G569 and M2‐A1‐G576 should be M2‐A2‐G569 and M2‐A1‐G576‐2, respectively. This erratum contains the correct data table (Table S2).

In addition, we would like to note that the isotope ratios for grains M1‐A4‐G557 and M2‐A1‐G303 reported in Table S2 are slightly different from those reported in Liu et al. (2017), due to small differences in the adopted regions of interest (ROIs) for data reduction. The use of different ROIs and slightly different normalization approaches also resulted in small differences between the silicon isotope ratios of X grains reported in Table S2 and in Liu et al. (2018). The two sets of data, however, generally overlap with each other within 1σ errors, and the small differences do not affect any of the discussions or conclusions in these papers.

在原始手稿的补充中，我们注意到表S2中存在一些小错误，如下所述。（1）M2-A4-G27晶粒的¹⁴ N / ¹⁵ N比的误差应为0.2，而不是0.3。（2）δ ³⁰颗粒M1-A5-G1112的SI值应该是16而不是19，（3）颗粒M2-A1-G569和M2-A1-G576的名称应该是M2-A2-G569和M2-分别为A1-G576-2。此勘误包含正确的数据表（表S2）。

此外，我们还要指出的是，表S2中报道的M1-A4-G557和M2-A1-G303晶粒的同位素比与Liu等人的报道略有不同。（2017），这是因为所采用的数据缩减感兴趣区域（ROI）的差异很小。使用不同的ROI和略微不同的归一化方法还导致表S2和Liu等人报道的X晶粒的硅同位素比之间的微小差异。（2018）。但是，两组数据通常在1σ的误差内相互重叠，并且这些微小差异不会影响这些论文中的任何讨论或结论。