Managing the impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) is a great societal challenge. A wide variety of terms have been used to describe the management of invasive alien species and the sequence in which they might be applied. This variety and lack of consistency creates uncertainty in the presentation and description of management in policy, science and practice. Here we expand on the existing description of the invasion process to develop an IAS management framework. We define the different forms of active management using a novel approach based on changes in species status, avoiding the need for stand-alone descriptions of management types, and provide a complete set of potential management activities. We propose a standardised set of management terminology as an emergent feature of this framework. We identified eight key forms of management: (1) pathway management, (2) interception, (3) limits to keeping, (4) secure keeping, (5) eradication, (6) complete reproductive removal, (7) containment and (8) suppression. We recognise four associated terms: prevention; captive management; rapid eradication; and long-term management, and note the use of impact mitigation and restoration as associated forms of management. We discuss the wider use of this framework and the supporting activities required to ensure management is well-targeted, cost-effective and makes best use of limited resources.

管理外来入侵物种（IAS）的影响是一项巨大的社会挑战。各种各样的术语已被用来描述外来入侵物种的管理及其应用顺序。这种多样性和缺乏一致性在政策，科学和实践中对管理的表述和描述产生了不确定性。在这里，我们将对入侵过程的现有描述进行扩展，以开发IAS管理框架。我们根据物种状况的变化使用新颖的方法定义了主动管理的不同形式，从而避免了对管理类型的单独描述的需要，并提供了一整套潜在的管理活动。我们提出了一套标准化的管理术语，作为该框架的新兴功能。我们确定了八种主要的管理形式：（1）途径管理，（2）拦截，（3）饲养限制，（4）安全饲养，（5）消除，（6）完全生殖清除，（7）遏制和（8）抑制。我们认识到四个相关的术语：预防；预防；预防。圈养管理；快速根除；和长期管理，并注意将减轻影响和恢复影响作为管理的相关形式。我们讨论了该框架的更广泛使用以及确保管理目标明确，具有成本效益并充分利用有限资源所需的支持活动。并注意将减轻影响和恢复影响作为管理的相关形式。我们讨论了该框架的更广泛使用以及确保管理目标明确，具有成本效益并充分利用有限资源所需的支持活动。并注意将减轻影响和恢复影响作为管理的相关形式。我们讨论了该框架的更广泛使用以及确保管理目标明确，具有成本效益并充分利用有限资源所需的支持活动。