当前位置: X-MOL 学术Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Absolute Accelerometer-Based Intensity Prescription Compared to Physiological Variables in Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Pub Date : 2020-08-05 , DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17165651
Philipp Birnbaumer 1 , Pavel Dietz 2 , Estelle Dorothy Watson 3 , Gudani Mukoma 4 , Alexander Müller 1 , Matteo Christian Sattler 1 , Johannes Jaunig 1 , Mireille Nicoline Maria van Poppel 1 , Peter Hofmann 1
Affiliation  

Estimation of the intensity of physical activity (PA) based on absolute accelerometer cut points (Cp) likely over- or underestimates intensity for a specific individual. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between absolute moderate intensity Cp and the first ventilatory threshold (VT1). A group of 24 pregnant and 15 nonpregnant women who performed a submaximal incremental walking test with measures of ventilatory parameters and accelerations from three different accelerometers on the wrist (ActiGraph wGT3X-BT, GENEActiv, Axivity AX3) and one on the hip (Actigraph wGT3X-BT) were analyzed. Cp were determined corresponding to 3 metabolic equivalents of task (MET), using the conventional MET definition (Cp3.5) (3.5 mL/kg×min) and individual resting metabolic rate (Cpind). The ventilatory equivalent (VE/VO2) was used to determine VT1. Accelerations at VT1 were significantly higher (p < 0.01) compared to Cp3.5 and Cpind in both groups. Cp3.5 and Cpind were significantly different in nonpregnant (p < 0.01) but not in pregnant women. Walking speed at VT1 (5.7 ± 0.5/6.2 ± 0.8 km/h) was significantly lower (p < 0.01) in pregnant compared to nonpregnant women and correspondent to 3.8 ± 0.7/4.9 ± 1.4 conventional METs. Intensity at absolute Cp was lower compared to the intensity at VT1 independent of the device or placement in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Therefore, we recommend individually tailored cut points such as the VT1 to better assess the effect of the intensity of PA.

中文翻译:

基于绝对加速度计的强度处方与孕妇和非孕妇的生理变量相比。

根据绝对加速度计切割点(Cp)估算身体活动强度(PA)可能会高估或低估特定个体的强度。这项研究的目的是调查绝对中等强度Cp与第一通气阈值(VT 1)之间的关系。一组24名孕妇和15名非孕妇,通过手腕上的三种不同加速度计(ActiGraph wGT3X-BT,GENEActiv,Axivity AX3)和一名髋部(Actigraph wGT3X- BT)进行了分析。使用常规MET定义确定对应于3个代谢当量任务(MET)的Cp(Cp 3.5)(3.5 mL / kg×min)和个体静息代谢率(Cp ind)。通气当量(VE / VO 2)用于确定VT 1。与两组中的Cp 3.5和Cp ind相比,VT 1的加速度显着更高(p <0.01)。非孕妇的Cp 3.5和Cp ind显着不同(p <0.01),但孕妇没有差异。VT 1时的步行速度(5.7±0.5 / 6.2±0.8 km / h)明显较低(p与未怀孕妇女相比,孕妇<0.01)与传统MET的3.8±0.7 / 4.9±1.4相对应。与VT 1强度相比,绝对Cp强度要低,与孕妇和未怀孕妇女的装置或放置无关。因此,我们建议单独定制切点,例如VT 1,以更好地评估PA强度的效果。
更新日期:2020-08-05
down
wechat
bug