当前位置: X-MOL 学术Cladistics › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Origins of SARS‐CoV‐1 and SARS‐CoV‐2 are often poorly explored in leading publications
Cladistics ( IF 3.9 ) Pub Date : 2020-07-30 , DOI: 10.1111/cla.12425
John Wenzel 1
Affiliation  

In the rush to understand the coronaviruses that threaten human health, authors of many prominent papers have not performed phylogenetic analyses to the standard of the field today. Errors include faulty placement of the root of the phylogeny, outdated methods of reconstruction, poor taxon sampling, inappropriate emphasis on selected functional elements, and inadequate consideration of ambiguity. As a result, certain conclusions regarding the origin of human infections are not supported soundly or are wrong.

中文翻译:

主要出版物中对 SARS-CoV-1 和 SARS-CoV-2 的起源往往缺乏探索

在急于了解威胁人类健康的冠状病毒的过程中,许多著名论文的作者并未按照当今该领域的标准进行系统发育分析。错误包括系统发育根源的错误放置、过时的重建方法、分类单元采样不当、对所选功能元素的不当强调以及对歧义的考虑不足。因此,关于人类感染起源的某些结论没有得到充分支持或错误。
更新日期:2020-07-30
down
wechat
bug