当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
What should be the Optimal Carotid Stent Opening Rate Without Post-Dilation?
Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases ( IF 2.0 ) Pub Date : 2020-07-29 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105155
Lütfi Öcal 1 , Ayhan Küp 1 , Mehmet Çelik 1 , Sinan Cerşit 1 , Muhammed Keskin 2 , Nuri Havan 3 , Mustafa Ozan Gürsoy 4 , Müslüm Şahin 5 , Hayati Eren 6 , Atilla Koyuncu 7 , Abdulkadir Uslu 1 , Fatih Yılmaz 1 , Mehmet Vefik Yazıcıoğlu 1 , Mehmet Muhsin Türkmen 1
Affiliation  

Background

There is not a widely accepted optimal rate of stent opening in patients underwent carotid artery stenting. In this study we evaluated the effect of carotid stent opening rate (CSOR) without performing post-dilation on in-hospital and long-term outcomes.

Methods

A total of 825 patient patients underwent carotid artery stenting without post-dilation enrolled to the study. The patients divided into two groups according to their final CSOR (50% ≤ Post-stent deployment (SD) <80% and 80% ≤ Post-SD ≤ 100%). In-hospital and 3-year outcomes were compared between the groups.

Results

During hospitalization, the rate of ipsilateral stroke, major stroke and transient ischemic attacks were similar between the groups (respectively; 6.2% vs. 4.1, P = 0.190; 1.5% vs. 1.8, P = 0.811; 1.5% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.683). The 3-year Kaplan-Meier overall survival rates for the first and second groups were 87.6% and 84.4%, respectively (log rank test P = 0.426). The 3-year Kaplan-Meier overall cumulative ipsilateral stroke rates for the first and second groups were 88.0% and 88.6%, respectively (log rank test P = 0.409)

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that a CSOR higher than 50% without performing a post-dilation might be an effective therapeutic approach since there was not a significant difference regarding outcomes between the patients with a 50% ≤ Post-SD <80% and 80% ≤ Post-SD ≤ 100%. The need for post-stent balloon dilation might have been eliminated due to subsequent stent self-expansion.



中文翻译:

没有后扩张的最佳颈动脉支架打开率应该是多少?

背景

在接受颈动脉支架置入术的患者中,支架打开的最佳速率尚未得到广泛认可。在这项研究中,我们评估了不进行扩张后颈动脉支架打开率(CSOR)对医院和长期预后的影响。

方法

共有825例患者接受了未经扩张的颈动脉支架置入研究。根据最终CSOR将患者分为两组(50%≤支架后部署(SD)<80%,而80%≤SD后≤100%)。比较两组间的住院和3年结局。

结果

住院期间,两组的同侧中风,大中风和短暂性脑缺血发作的发生率相似(分别为:6.2%vs. 4.1,P = 0.190; 1.5%vs. 1.8,P = 0.811; 1.5%vs. 1.9%, P = 0.683)。第一组和第二组的3年Kaplan-Meier总生存率分别为87.6%和84.4%(对数秩检验P = 0.426)。第一组和第二组的3年Kaplan-Meier总同侧中风发生率分别为88.0%和88.6%(对数秩检验P = 0.409)

结论

我们的研究表明,不进行扩张后CSOR高于50%可能是一种有效的治疗方法,因为50%≤SD后<80%和80%≤Post的患者之间的结局无显着差异-SD≤100%。由于随后的支架自扩张,可能消除了支架后球囊扩张的需要。

更新日期:2020-07-29
down
wechat
bug