The article examines a number of ways in which the use of artificial intelligence technologies to predict the performance of individuals and to reach decisions concerning the entitlement of individuals to positive decisions impacts individuals and society. It analyses the effects using a social justice lens. Particular attention is paid to the experiences of individuals who have historically experienced disadvantage and discrimination. The article uses the university admissions process where the university utilises a fully automated decision-making process to evaluate the capability or suitability of the candidate as a case study. The article posits that the artificial intelligence decision-making process should be viewed as an institution that reconfigures the relationships between individuals, and between individuals and institutions. Artificial intelligence decision-making processes have institutional elements embedded within them that result in their operation disadvantaging groups who have historically experienced discrimination. Depending on the manner in which an artificial intelligence decision-making process is designed, it can produce solidarity or segregation between groups in society. There is a potential for the operation of artificial intelligence decision-making processes to fail to reflect the lived experiences of individuals and as a result to undermine the protection of human diversity. Some of these effects are linked to the creation of an ableist culture and to the resurrection of eugenics-type discourses. It is concluded that one of the contexts in which human beings should reach decisions is where the decision involves representing and evaluating the capabilities of an individual. The legislature should respond accordingly by identifying contexts in which it is mandatory to employ human decision-makers and by enacting the relevant legislation.

本文探讨了使用人工智能技术预测个人表现并做出有关个人享有积极决定权的决定对个人和社会产生影响的多种方式。它使用社会公正的视角来分析影响。特别要注意历史上曾经历过不利和歧视的个人的经历。本文使用大学录取过程，其中大学利用全自动决策过程评估作为案例研究的候选人的能力或适合性。文章认为，人工智能决策过程应被视为重新配置个人之间以及个人与机构之间关系的机构。人工智能决策过程具有嵌入其中的体制元素，这导致其运作不利于历来遭受歧视的群体。根据设计人工智能决策过程的方式，它可以在社会中的各个群体之间产生团结或隔离。人工智能决策过程的运作可能无法反映个人的生活经验，从而破坏对人类多样性的保护。其中一些影响与创造能力文化以及复生优生学类型的话语有关。结论是，人类应该做出决策的环境之一是决策涉及代表和评估个人能力的地方。立法机关应通过确定强制雇用人为决策者的背景并制定相关立法来做出相应反应。