Utilisation of recycled construction and demolition waste (CDW) within pavements is a beneficial substitution technique towards sustainability. Following this approach, this research investigates the feasibility of using waste ceramic powder as an alternative filler in mastics. To evaluate the performance of the alternative ceramic filler, its physical and chemical properties were compared to a commonly used mineral filler – limestone. Mastics were made using both fillers and the same reference bitumen. These unaged and Pressure Aging Vessel (PAV) aged materials were tested using the Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR) to measure the rheological properties and evaluate them using the 2 Springs-2 Parabolic Elements-1 Damper (2S2P1D) model. Furthermore, fatigue and rutting resistance tests the unaged bitumen and mastics were also done using the same machine. The aging index and bitumen–filler interaction values were also calculated. The results were synthesised in a single performance diagram for visual comparison of various parameters for different materials. Overall, after comparison of various parameters, it was observed that the ceramic powder can be effectively used as a filler alternative in asphalt, having higher stiffness, better aging characteristics, higher bitumen–filler interaction and rutting resistance and similar fatigue performance to that of the limestone mastic.

在人行道内利用回收的建筑和拆除废物 (CDW) 是实现可持续性的有益替代技术。按照这种方法，本研究调查了使用废陶瓷粉末作为胶粘剂中替代填料的可行性。为了评估替代陶瓷填料的性能，将其物理和化学特性与常用的矿物填料——石灰石进行了比较。胶粘剂是使用两种填料和相同的参考沥青制成的。这些未老化和压力老化容器 (PAV) 老化的材料使用动态剪切流变仪 (DSR) 进行测试，以测量流变特性并使用 2 Springs-2 Parabolic Elements-1 Damper (2S2P1D) 模型对其进行评估。此外，疲劳和抗车辙测试 未老化的沥青和胶粘剂也是使用同一台机器完成的。还计算了老化指数和沥青-填料相互作用值。结果综合在一张性能图中，用于对不同材料的各种参数进行可视化比较。总体而言，在比较各种参数后，观察到陶瓷粉末可以有效地用作沥青中的填料替代品，具有更高的刚度、更好的老化特性、更高的沥青-填料相互作用和抗车辙性以及与沥青类似的疲劳性能。石灰石乳香。