当前位置: X-MOL 学术Carbon Manag. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Carbon sequestration in paddy soil as influenced by organic and inorganic amendments
Carbon Management ( IF 2.8 ) Pub Date : 2020-03-19 , DOI: 10.1080/17583004.2020.1738822
Md Mozammel Haque 1 , J. C. Biswas 1 , M. Maniruzaman 1 , S. Akhter 2 , M. S. Kabir 1
Affiliation  

Rice plants mediate carbon (C) emission from paddy soils but also absorb it as carbon dioxide (CO2) during photosynthesis. This means that net C emission could vary depending on rice cultivation techniques, which is not well documented in Asian regions. In the present investigation, the effect of different C sources on major greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes and their relationships between C inputs and outputs were established by using closed static chamber technique. Total methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and CO2 emissions were significantly higher with integrated plant nutrient system (IPNS) based fertilization with cowdung (CD), poultry manure (PM) and vermicompost (VC) than chemical fertilizer alone. Net ecosystem C budget (NECB) was positive with CD-IPNS (52–54 kg C ha−1), PM-IPNS (62–64 kg C ha−1) and VC-IPNS (53–56 kg C ha−1) but negative with chemical fertilization (−7 to −8 kg C ha−1). In control and chemical fertilizer treatments, net CO2 sequestration was negative (−602 and −87 kg CO2 ha−1), but organic amendments showed positive CO2 sequestration that varied from 68 to 94 kg CO2 ha−1 during the study periods. Organic amendment significantly improved CO2 capturing capacity by about 17–22 gm kg−1 grain yield compared to chemical fertilization (−24 to −25 gm kg−1). Rice yield also enhanced by about 14–23% with organic amendments compared to chemical fertilizer treatment. In conclusion, use of organic C sources would be very valuable practice to increase net CO2 sequestration and wet season rice yield under tropical climatic conditions.



中文翻译:

有机和无机改良剂对稻田土壤固碳的影响

水稻植物介导稻田土壤中的碳(C)排放,但在光合作用过程中也以二氧化碳(CO 2)的形式吸收。这意味着净碳排放量可能会因水稻栽培技术而异,这在亚洲地区尚无充分的文献记载。在本研究中,使用封闭式静态室技术建立了不同碳源对主要温室气体通量的影响及其在碳输入与输出之间的关系。甲烷(CH 4),一氧化二氮(N 2 O)和CO 2总量与仅使用化肥相比,采用牛粪(CD),家禽粪便(PM)和integrated堆肥(VC)的综合植物营养系统(IPNS)施肥的排放量显着更高。CD-IPNS(52–54 kg C ha -1),PM-IPNS(62–64 kg C ha -1)和VC-IPNS(53–56 kg C ha -1)的净生态系统C预算(NECB)为正),但化学施肥(-7至-8 kg C ha -1)为负。在对照和化学肥料处理中,净CO 2固存为负(-602和-87 kg CO 2 ha -1),但是有机改良剂显示出正CO 2固存,变化范围为68至94 kg CO 2 ha -1在学习期间。与化学施肥相比(-24至-25 gm kg -1),有机改良剂显着提高了约17-22 gm kg -1谷物产量的CO 2捕获能力。与化学肥料处理相比,有机改良的水稻产量也提高了约14-23%。总之,在热带气候条件下,使用有机碳源将是增加净CO 2固存和增加湿季水稻产量的非常有价值的实践。

更新日期:2020-03-19
down
wechat
bug