Employers are increasingly using information and communication technologies to monitor employees. Such workplace surveillance is extensive in the United States, but its experience and potential consequences differ across groups based on gender. We thus sought to identify whether self‐reported male and female employees differ in the extent to which they find the use of workplace cameras equipped with facial recognition technology (FRT) acceptable, and examine the role of privacy attitudes more generally in mediating views on workplace surveillance. Using data from a nationally representative survey conducted by the Pew Research Center, we find that women are much less likely than men to approve of the use of cameras using FRT in the workplace. We then further explore whether men and women think differently about privacy, and if perceptions of privacy moderate the relationship between gender and approval of workplace surveillance. Finally, we consider the implications of these findings for privacy and surveillance via embedded technologies, and how the consequences of surveillance and technologies like FRT may be gendered. Note: We recognize evaluations based on a binary definition of gender are invariably partial and exclusionary. As we note in our discussion of the study’s limitations, we were constrained by the survey categories provided by Pew.

中文翻译：

---

“我不希望有人在我工作时监视我”：工作场所监控中面部识别技术的性别观点

雇主越来越多地使用信息和通信技术来监控员工。这种工作场所监控在美国很广泛，但其经验和潜在后果因性别而异。因此，我们试图确定自我报告的男性和女性员工在他们认为使用配备面部识别技术 (FRT) 的工作场所摄像头的程度方面是否存在差异，并更普遍地检查隐私态度在调解工作场所观点方面的作用监视。使用皮尤研究中心进行的全国代表性调查的数据，我们发现女性比男性更不可能批准在工作场所使用 FRT 摄像头。然后我们进一步探讨男性和女性对隐私的看法是否不同，如果对隐私的看法会缓和性别与工作场所监督的批准之间的关系。最后，我们考虑了这些发现对通过嵌入式技术进行的隐私和监视的影响，以及监视和 FRT 等技术的后果如何被性别化。注意：我们承认基于性别的二元定义的评估总是部分和排斥的。正如我们在讨论该研究的局限性时所指出的，我们受到皮尤提供的调查类别的限制。我们认识到，基于性别二元定义的评估总是片面的和排斥的。正如我们在讨论该研究的局限性时所指出的，我们受到皮尤提供的调查类别的限制。我们认识到，基于性别二元定义的评估总是片面的和排斥的。正如我们在讨论该研究的局限性时所指出的，我们受到皮尤提供的调查类别的限制。