Since the emergence of psychological interventions delivered via the Internet they have differed in numerous ways. The wealth of formats, methods, and technological solutions has led to increased availability and cost-effectiveness of clinical care, however, it has simultaneously generated a multitude of terms. With this paper, we first aim to establish whether a terminology issue exists in the field of Internet-delivered psychological interventions. If so, we aim to determine its implications for research, education, and practice. Furthermore, we intend to discuss solutions to mitigate the problem; in particular, we propose the concept of a common glossary. We invited 23 experts in the field of Internet-delivered interventions to respond to four questions, and employed the Delphi method to facilitate a discussion. We found that experts overwhelmingly agreed that there were terminological challenges, and that it had significant consequences for conducting research, treating patients, educating students, and informing the general public about Internet-delivered interventions. A cautious agreement has been reached that formulating a common glossary would be beneficial for the field to address the terminology issue. We end with recommendations for the possible formats of the glossary and means to disseminate it in a way that maximizes the probability of broad acceptance for a variety of stakeholders.

自从通过互联网提供心理干预措施以来，它们已经在许多方面有所不同。格式，方法和技术解决方案的丰富性导致临床护理的可用性和成本效益提高，但是，它同时产生了许多术语。本文首先旨在确定在互联网提供的心理干预领域中是否存在术语问题。如果是这样，我们旨在确定其对研究，教育和实践的影响。此外，我们打算讨论缓解问题的解决方案；特别是，我们提出了通用词汇表的概念。我们邀请了Internet干预领域的23位专家回答四个问题，并采用了Delphi方法来促进讨论。我们发现，专家们以压倒性多数同意存在术语挑战，并且这对进行研究，治疗患者，教育学生以及向公众通报互联网提供的干预措施具有重大影响。已经达成谨慎的共识，即制定通用的词汇表对于解决该术语问题的领域将是有益的。我们以有关词汇表的可能格式的建议为结尾，并以最大程度地使各种利益相关者广泛接受的方式进行传播。已经达成谨慎的共识，即制定通用的词汇表对于解决该术语问题的领域将是有益的。我们以有关词汇表的可能格式的建议为结尾，并以最大程度地使各种利益相关者广泛接受的方式进行传播。已经达成谨慎的共识，即制定通用的词汇表对于解决该术语问题的领域将是有益的。我们以有关词汇表的可能格式的建议为结尾，并以最大程度地使各种利益相关者广泛接受的方式进行传播。