Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
What's left for the neo-Copenhagen theorist
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics ( IF 1.663 ) Pub Date : 2019-12-25 , DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.10.005
Michael Dascal

Frauchiger and Renner (2018) argue that no ‘single-world’ theory can consistently maintain quantum mechanical predictions for all systems. Following Bub (2017, 2018, 2019), I argue here that this is overstated, and use their result to develop a framework for neo-Copenhagen theories that avoid the problem. To describe the framework I introduce two concepts, ontological information deficits, and information frames, and explore how these may ultimately be fleshed out by the theorist. I then consider some immediate worries that may be raised against the framework, and conclude by looking at how some existing theories may be seen to fit into it.



中文翻译:

新哥本哈根理论家还剩下什么

Frauchiger和Renner(2018)认为,没有任何``单一世界''理论能够始终如一地维护所有系统的量子力学预测。继Bub(2017、2018、2019)之后,我在这里认为这被夸大了,并利用他们的结果为避免这种问题的新哥本哈根理论开发了框架。为了描述框架,我介绍了两个概念,本体论信息缺陷信息框架,并探讨了理论家最终如何充实它们。然后,我考虑可能对框架提出的一些直接担忧,并通过研究如何看待一些现有理论来得出结论。

更新日期:2019-12-25
down
wechat
bug