Evidence suggests the growing importance of interorganizational relationships in developing intrapreneurial capabilities. In this paper, we argue that exploitation- and exploration-oriented network ties strengthen intrapreneurial capabilities in dynamic environments. To do so, we integrate the underlying assumptions of asset positions in the dynamic capabilities perspective with the open innovation perspective to highlight the implications of interorganizational ties for value capturing and value creating. The resulting model is discussed using the open source ecosystem as a context that exemplifies the complexities of the symbiotic relationships among network actors in the software industry. This study makes several contributions. First, we contribute to research on intrapreneurial capabilities by explicating the role of different types of network ties in recognizing and leveraging opportunities. Second, we extend the scope of the dynamic capabilities literature by integrating a network perspective to reconceptualize asset positioning in the context of value co-creation and co-capture. Third, we address the complexities associated with intellectual property rights in sharing assets through different forms of network ties. Lastly, we link the dynamic capabilities literature with ambidexterity research by offering insights on how asset sharing can facilitate the simultaneous development of capabilities related to both exploration and exploitation in dynamic environments.

有证据表明，组织间关系在发展神经内能力方面越来越重要。在本文中，我们认为面向开发和探索的网络联系增强了动态环境中的企业内部能力。为此，我们将动态能力视角中的资产头寸基础假设与开放式创新视角相结合，以突出组织间联系对价值获取和价值创造的影响。使用开源生态系统作为背景讨论了所得模型，该背景例证了软件行业中网络参与者之间共生关系的复杂性。这项研究做出了一些贡献。第一，我们通过阐明不同类型的网络纽带在认识和利用机会中的作用，为研究脑内能力做出了贡献。其次，我们通过集成网络角度来扩展动态能力文献的范围，以在价值共同创造和共同捕获的背景下​​重新概念化资产定位。第三，我们通过不同形式的网络联系来解决与共享资产相关的知识产权的复杂性。最后，我们通过提供关于资产共享如何促进动态环境中勘探和开发相关能力的同步开发的见解，将动态能力文献与歧义性研究联系起来。我们通过整合网络视角，在价值共同创造和共同捕获的背景下​​重新概念化资产定位，扩展了动态能力文献的范围。第三，我们通过不同形式的网络联系来解决与共享资产相关的知识产权的复杂性。最后，我们通过提供关于资产共享如何促进动态环境中勘探和开发相关能力的同步开发的见解，将动态能力文献与歧义性研究联系起来。我们通过整合网络视角，在价值共同创造和共同捕获的背景下​​重新概念化资产定位，扩展了动态能力文献的范围。第三，我们通过不同形式的网络联系来解决与共享资产相关的知识产权的复杂性。最后，我们通过提供关于资产共享如何促进动态环境中勘探和开发相关能力的同步开发的见解，将动态能力文献与歧义性研究联系起来。