Abstract As the spent fuel pools of Angra 1 and Angra 2 nuclear power plants are near their capacity limits, Eletronuclear of Brazil has begun its plans to the first independent spent fuel storage installation in Brazil. However, the lack of a domestic safety standard for an ISFSI* has forced the Brazilian National Nuclear Energy Commission to adopt the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission requirements for the preparation of an ISFSI Safety Analysis Report. Consequently, the need for a comparison and gap analysis of the regulatory requirements for quality assurance systems in USNRC 10CFR Part72 Subpart G with the Brazilian standard CNEN–NN–1.16, became timely and necessary. The main purpose of this research is to establish the correlation of requirements between USNRC 10CFR Part72 Subpart G with the Brazilian standard CNEN–NN–1.16 for the effective implementation of a quality assurance system and its role in the nuclear license process of an ISFSI. In light of this goal, this research has been developed based on the characterization of the normative bases and the elaboration of a correlation matrix of similar requirements. The results of this research, document that there is harmonization and coherence between both normative codes, and further establishes that in the area of QAS requirements, both approaches are acceptable.

中文翻译：

---

质量保证标准的比较：美国和巴西规范构建 ISFSI 的相关性

摘要 由于 Angra 1 和 Angra 2 核电站乏燃料池已接近其容量极限，巴西 Eletronuclear 已开始计划在巴西建造第一个独立的乏燃料储存装置。然而，由于缺乏针对 ISFSI* 的国内安全标准，巴西国家核能委员会不得不采用美国核管理委员会的要求来编写 ISFSI 安全分析报告。因此，对 USNRC 10CFR Part72 Subpart G 中质量保证体系的监管要求与巴西标准 CNEN-NN-1.16 进行比较和差距分析的需要变得及时和必要。本研究的主要目的是建立 USNRC 10CFR Part72 Subpart G 与巴西标准 CNEN-NN-1 之间要求的相关性。16 有效实施质量保证体系及其在 ISFSI 核许可过程中的作用。鉴于此目标，本研究是基于规范基础的表征和类似要求的相关矩阵的阐述而开展的。这项研究的结果证明了两种规范性代码之间存在协调和连贯性，并进一步确定在 QAS 要求领域，两种方法都是可以接受的。