当前位置: X-MOL 学术Urban Forestry Urban Green. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Research on Visual Behavior Characteristics and Cognitive Evaluation of Different Types of Forest Landscape Spaces
Urban Forestry & Urban Greening ( IF 6.0 ) Pub Date : 2020-10-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126788
Yu Gao , Tong Zhang , Weikang Zhang , Huan Meng , Zhi Zhang

Abstract Background With the increasing demand for forest tourism and forest leisure space in recent years, providing a high-quality forest landscape space to participants has become an increasingly important topic for designers and managers of forest parks. Main purpose To clarify differences in the visual behavior characteristics and psychological cognitive evaluation of participants when viewing different types of forest landscape spaces and to explore the relationship between them in order to identify the psychological evaluation factors that affect visual behavior. This analysis will provide a theoretical basis and a basis for the construction and reconstruction of forest park landscape spaces, even for new forests in the future. Methods This study used eye-tracking technology and cognitive questionnaires for participants. ANOVA and Spearman's rho correlation analysis in SPSS 23.0 were used to statistically analyze the data. Main results 1. There are differences in participants' visual behavior, especially in visual spans, when participants appreciate different types of forest landscape spaces. The visual span of forest waterscape space is small, while the visual span of in-forest landscape space is large. 2. There are differences in participants' psychological cognitive evaluations of different types of forest landscape spaces. The forest waterscape space is evaluated highly on multiple indicators, especially for dynamic water space, whereas for in-forest landscape space, participants also pay attention to unique or interesting landscape elements, with the exception of color and plants. 3. There are correlations between the mean visual span, mean pupil diameter and psychological cognitive evaluation of participants in different types of forest landscape spaces. When people admire scenes with diverse plant species, rich landscape content, good landscape depth and permeability, rich and bright color, open and tidy spaces, and good landscape permeability and layering, their mean pupil diameter and lateral and portrait visual span are small. Based on the above analysis, we recommend that when planning and designing forest landscape space, we should consider not only the characteristics of different types of landscape spaces and their visual and cognitive effects for participants but also the combination of some iconic elements or interesting landscape elements.

中文翻译:

不同类型森林景观空间的视觉行为特征及认知评价研究

摘要 背景随着近年来对森林旅游和森林休闲空间需求的不断增加,为参与者提供优质的森林景观空间已成为森林公园设计者和管理者日益关注的课题。主要目的 阐明参与者在观看不同类型森林景观空间时视觉行为特征和心理认知评价的差异,并探讨它们之间的关系,以识别影响视觉行为的心理评价因素。这一分析将为森林公园景观空间的建设和重构提供理论依据和依据,甚至为未来新建森林提供依据。方法 本研究对参与者使用眼动追踪技术和认知问卷。采用SPSS 23.0中的方差分析和Spearman's rho相关分析对数据进行统计分析。主要结果 1.当参与者欣赏不同类型的森林景观空间时,参与者的视觉行为存在差异,尤其是在视觉跨度上。森林水景空间的视觉跨度小,而林内景观空间的视觉跨度大。2、参与者对不同类型森林景观空间的心理认知评价存在差异。森林水景空间在多项指标上评价较高,尤其是动态水景空间,而对于林内景观空间,除了色彩和植物外,参与者还关注独特或有趣的景观元素。3. 平均视觉跨度之间存在相关性,不同类型森林景观空间参与者的平均瞳孔直径和心理认知评价. 当人们欣赏植物种类多样、景观内容丰富、景观深度和渗透性好、色彩丰富明亮、空间开阔整洁、景观渗透性和层次感好的场景时,他们的平均瞳孔直径和横向和纵向的视觉跨度都较小。基于以上分析,我们建议在规划和设计森林景观空间时,不仅要考虑不同类型景观空间的特点及其对参与者的视觉和认知效果,还要考虑一些标志性元素或有趣的景观元素的组合。 . 当人们欣赏植物种类多样、景观内容丰富、景观深度和渗透性好、色彩丰富明亮、空间开阔整洁、景观渗透性和层次感好的场景时,他们的平均瞳孔直径和横向和纵向的视觉跨度都较小。基于以上分析,我们建议在规划和设计森林景观空间时,不仅要考虑不同类型景观空间的特点及其对参与者的视觉和认知效果,还要考虑一些标志性元素或有趣的景观元素的组合。 . 当人们欣赏植物种类多样、景观内容丰富、景观深度和渗透性好、色彩丰富明亮、空间开阔整洁、景观渗透性和层次感好的场景时,他们的平均瞳孔直径和横向和纵向的视觉跨度都较小。基于以上分析,我们建议在规划和设计森林景观空间时,不仅要考虑不同类型景观空间的特点及其对参与者的视觉和认知效果,还要考虑一些标志性元素或有趣的景观元素的组合。 . 他们的平均瞳孔直径和横向和纵向视觉跨度都很小。基于以上分析,我们建议在规划和设计森林景观空间时,不仅要考虑不同类型景观空间的特点及其对参与者的视觉和认知效果,还要考虑一些标志性元素或有趣的景观元素的组合。 . 他们的平均瞳孔直径和横向和纵向视觉跨度都很小。基于以上分析,我们建议在规划和设计森林景观空间时,不仅要考虑不同类型景观空间的特点及其对参与者的视觉和认知效果,还要考虑一些标志性元素或有趣的景观元素的组合。 .
更新日期:2020-10-01
down
wechat
bug