Abstract Land consolidation projects (LCP) are the most effective method for quick amendment of poor land fragmentation parameters. At the same time, they are costly due to both a long time horizon and auxiliary projects, in particular, road construction and improvement of field drainage or irrigation systems. The range of changes in parcel arrangement after consolidation varies, as does the economic efficiency of LCPs related to the changes. The paper proposes a approach to the assessment of LCPs that takes into account the production and income effects, which influence the income of farmers participating in consolidation processes, and potential benefits, such as the increased value of farmland and the effect of improved quality of cadastral documentation. Static and dynamic economic feasibility indices were calculated. In the latter case, a thirty-year life of the project and a 2.5 % discount rate were assumed. The study involved six projects completed in Poland under the European Union Rural Development Programme 2007–2013. The effectiveness of the investments was found to vary significantly. The calculated payback period was most often a few to several dozen years, depending on the project, index, and scope of considered effects. It has been demonstrated that if potential economic rents are included, the estimated payback period for an LCP can be reduced several times. It was further concluded that it is necessary to develop a method for the valuation of non-production effects of LCPs such as social, environmental, and landscape benefits.

中文翻译：

---

衡量土地整理的有效性：一种基于波兰选定案例研究的经济方法

摘要 土地整理项目(LCP)是快速修正不良土地破碎化参数的最有效方法。同时，由于时间长和辅助项目，特别是道路建设和田间排水或灌溉系统的改善，它们的成本很高。合并后地块安排的变化范围各不相同，与变化相关的 LCP 的经济效率也不同。本文提出了一种评估 LCP 的方法，该方法考虑了生产和收入影响，这些影响会影响参与整合过程的农民的收入，以及潜在的收益，例如农田价值的增加和地籍质量改善的影响。文档。计算静态和动态经济可行性指标。在后一种情况下，假设项目的寿命为 30 年，贴现率为 2.5%。该研究涉及在 2007-2013 年欧盟农村发展计划下在波兰完成的六个项目。发现投资的有效性差异很大。计算的投资回收期通常为几年到几十年，具体取决于项目、指数和考虑的影响范围。已经证明，如果包括潜在的经济租金，LCP 的预计投资回收期可以缩短数倍。进一步的结论是，有必要开发一种方法来评估 LCP 的非生产影响，例如社会、环境和景观效益。该研究涉及在 2007-2013 年欧盟农村发展计划下在波兰完成的六个项目。发现投资的有效性差异很大。计算的投资回收期通常为几年到几十年，具体取决于项目、指数和考虑的影响范围。已经证明，如果包括潜在的经济租金，LCP 的预计投资回收期可以缩短数倍。进一步的结论是，有必要开发一种方法来评估 LCP 的非生产影响，例如社会、环境和景观效益。该研究涉及在 2007-2013 年欧盟农村发展计划下在波兰完成的六个项目。发现投资的有效性差异很大。计算的投资回收期通常为几年到几十年，具体取决于项目、指数和考虑的影响范围。已经证明，如果包括潜在的经济租金，LCP 的预计投资回收期可以缩短数倍。进一步的结论是，有必要开发一种方法来评估 LCP 的非生产影响，例如社会、环境和景观效益。和考虑的影响范围。已经证明，如果包括潜在的经济租金，LCP 的预计投资回收期可以缩短数倍。进一步的结论是，有必要开发一种方法来评估 LCP 的非生产影响，例如社会、环境和景观效益。和考虑的影响范围。已经证明，如果包括潜在的经济租金，LCP 的预计投资回收期可以缩短数倍。进一步的结论是，有必要开发一种方法来评估 LCP 的非生产影响，例如社会、环境和景观效益。