当前位置: X-MOL 学术arXiv.cs.CR › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Giving Up Privacy For Security: A Survey On Privacy Trade-off During Pandemic Emergency
arXiv - CS - Cryptography and Security Pub Date : 2020-07-01 , DOI: arxiv-2007.04109
Sajedul Talukder and Md. Iftekharul Islam Sakib and Zahidur Talukder

While the COVID-19 pandemic continues to be as complex as ever, the collection and exchange of data in the light of fighting coronavirus poses a major challenge for privacy systems around the globe. The disease's size and magnitude is not uncommon but it appears to be at the point of hysteria surrounding it. Consequently, in a very short time, extreme measures for dealing with the situation appear to have become the norm. Any such actions affect the privacy of individuals in particular. For some cases, there is intensive monitoring of the whole population while the medical data of those diagnosed with the virus is commonly circulated through institutions and nations. This may well be in the interest of saving the world from a deadly disease, but is it really appropriate and right? Although creative solutions have been implemented in many countries to address the issue, proponents of privacy are concerned that technologies will eventually erode privacy, while regulators and privacy supporters are worried about what kind of impact this could bring. While that tension has always been present, privacy has been thrown into sharp relief by the sheer urgency of containing an exponentially spreading virus. The essence of this dilemma indicates that establishing the right equilibrium will be the best solution. The jurisprudence concerning cases regarding the willingness of public officials to interfere with the constitutional right to privacy in the interests of national security or public health has repeatedly proven that a reasonable balance can be reached.

中文翻译:

为安全放弃隐私:大流行紧急情况下的隐私权衡调查

尽管 COVID-19 大流行仍然像以往一样复杂,但在与冠状病毒作斗争的情况下收集和交换数据对全球隐私系统构成了重大挑战。这种疾病的规模和严重程度并不少见,但它似乎处于歇斯底里的地步。因此,在很短的时间内,应对这种情况的极端措施似乎已成为常态。任何此类行为都会特别影响个人隐私。在某些情况下,对整个人口进行密集监测,而诊断出病毒的人的医疗数据通常在机构和国家之间传播。这很可能是为了拯救世界免受致命疾病的侵害,但这真的合适吗?尽管许多国家已经实施了创造性的解决方案来解决这个问题,但隐私支持者担心技术最终会侵蚀隐私,而监管者和隐私支持者则担心这会带来什么样的影响。尽管这种紧张局势一直存在,但由于遏制呈指数级传播的病毒的紧迫性,隐私权已大大减轻。这种困境的本质表明,建立正确的均衡将是最好的解决方案。公职人员为了国家安全或公共健康的利益而愿意干涉宪法隐私权案件的判例,一再证明可以达到合理的平衡。隐私支持者担心技术最终会侵蚀隐私,而监管者和隐私支持者则担心这会带来什么样的影响。尽管这种紧张局势一直存在,但由于遏制呈指数级传播的病毒的紧迫性,隐私权已大大减轻。这种困境的本质表明,建立正确的均衡将是最好的解决方案。公职人员为了国家安全或公共健康的利益而愿意干涉宪法隐私权案件的判例,一再证明可以达到合理的平衡。隐私支持者担心技术最终会侵蚀隐私,而监管者和隐私支持者则担心这会带来什么样的影响。尽管这种紧张局势一直存在,但由于遏制呈指数级传播的病毒的紧迫性,隐私权已大大减轻。这种困境的本质表明,建立正确的均衡将是最好的解决方案。公职人员为了国家安全或公共健康的利益而愿意干涉宪法隐私权案件的判例,一再证明可以达到合理的平衡。而监管者和隐私支持者则担心这会带来什么样的影响。尽管这种紧张局势一直存在,但由于遏制呈指数级传播的病毒的紧迫性,隐私权已大大减轻。这种困境的本质表明,建立正确的均衡将是最好的解决方案。公职人员为了国家安全或公共健康的利益而愿意干涉宪法隐私权案件的判例,一再证明可以达到合理的平衡。而监管者和隐私支持者则担心这会带来什么样的影响。尽管这种紧张局势一直存在,但由于遏制呈指数级传播的病毒的紧迫性,隐私权已大大减轻。这种困境的本质表明,建立正确的均衡将是最好的解决方案。公职人员为了国家安全或公共健康的利益而愿意干涉宪法隐私权案件的判例,一再证明可以达到合理的平衡。这种困境的本质表明,建立正确的均衡将是最好的解决方案。公职人员为了国家安全或公共健康的利益而愿意干涉宪法隐私权案件的判例,一再证明可以达到合理的平衡。这种困境的本质表明,建立正确的均衡将是最好的解决方案。公职人员为了国家安全或公共健康的利益而愿意干涉宪法隐私权案件的判例,一再证明可以达到合理的平衡。
更新日期:2020-07-09
down
wechat
bug