当前位置: X-MOL 学术Sustain. Sci. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Environmental sustainable value in agriculture revisited: How does Common Agricultural Policy contribute to eco-efficiency?
Sustainability Science ( IF 5.1 ) Pub Date : 2020-07-08 , DOI: 10.1007/s11625-020-00834-6
Bazyli Czyżewski , Anna Matuszczak , Aleksander Grzelak , Marta Guth , Adam Majchrzak

The conflict between capital-intensive agriculture, often called industrial agriculture, and sustainable farming is ongoing, and not because of Western European countries, where intensification is increasingly sustainable. It is caused by several million small farms in Central and Eastern Europe that must choose a long-term development path. This is also a dilemma for agricultural policy: Are small farms so environmentally friendly that they should play the role of ‘landscape guardians’ at the expense of public support and economic vegetation, or should they strive to improve productivity through investments? This study offers a methodological contribution to the value-based sustainability approach by computing indicators of environmental sustainable value (ESV). The authors have attempted to combine the value-oriented approach with frontier benchmarking. They then tested how the European Union Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) schemes contribute to ESV using a long-term panel of regionally representative farms from Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) with regard to factor endowments, for the years 2004–2017. The seminal within–between specification was employed to control the time variant and time invariant space heterogeneity of European regions. The main finding is that higher investment support is beneficial to ESV. Regarding factor endowment influence, there was a positive impact of the capital–labour ratio. Except the cross-sectional impact of environmental subsidies, the payments exert a negative effect on ESV.



中文翻译:

重新审视农业中的环境可持续价值:共同农业政策如何促进生态效率?

资本密集型农业(通常称为工业农业)与可持续农业之间的冲突仍在持续,这并不是因为集约化越来越可持续的西欧国家之间的冲突。这是由中欧和东欧的数百万个小农场造成的,这些农场必须选择长期发展道路。这也是农业政策的两难境地:小型农场是否对环境如此友好,以至于他们应该以牺牲公共支持和经济植被为代价扮演“景观守护者”的角色,还是应该通过投资努力提高生产率?这项研究通过计算环境可持续价值(ESV)指标,为基于价值的可持续性方法提供了方法论上的贡献。作者试图将基于价值的方法与前沿基准进行结合。然后,他们使用了来自农场会计数据网络(FADN)的地区代表性农场的长期小组关于要素end赋的2004-2017年期间,测试了欧盟共同农业政策(CAP)计划如何为ESV做出贡献。规范之间的影响力被用来控制欧洲地区的时变和时不变空间异质性。主要发现是,更高的投资支持对ESV有利。关于要素end赋的影响,资本劳动比产生了积极的影响。除了环境补贴的横截面影响外,这些付款对ESV产生负面影响。然后,他们使用了来自农场会计数据网络(FADN)的地区代表性农场的长期小组关于要素end赋的2004-2017年期间,测试了欧盟共同农业政策(CAP)计划如何为ESV做出贡献。规范之间的影响力被用来控制欧洲地区的时变和时不变空间异质性。主要发现是,更高的投资支持对ESV有利。关于要素end赋的影响,资本劳动比产生了积极的影响。除了环境补贴的横截面影响外,这些付款对ESV产生负面影响。然后,他们使用了来自农场会计数据网络(FADN)的地区代表性农场的长期小组关于要素end赋的2004-2017年期间,测试了欧盟共同农业政策(CAP)计划如何为ESV做出贡献。规范之间的影响力被用来控制欧洲地区的时变和时不变空间异质性。主要发现是,更高的投资支持对ESV有利。关于要素end赋的影响,资本劳动比产生了积极的影响。除了环境补贴的横截面影响外,这些付款对ESV产生负面影响。规范之间的影响力被用来控制欧洲地区的时变和时不变空间异质性。主要发现是,更高的投资支持对ESV有利。关于要素end赋的影响,资本劳动比产生了积极的影响。除了环境补贴的横截面影响外,这些付款对ESV产生负面影响。规范之间的影响力被用来控制欧洲地区的时变和时不变空间异质性。主要发现是,更高的投资支持对ESV有利。关于要素end赋的影响,资本劳动比产生了积极的影响。除了环境补贴的横截面影响外,这些付款对ESV产生负面影响。

更新日期:2020-07-08
down
wechat
bug