1 Three Discipline Collaborative Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) Debate Series

Radiation Oncology is a highly multidisciplinary medical specialty, drawing significantly from three scientific disciplines — medicine, physics, and biology. As a result, discussion of controversies or changes in practice within radiation oncology must involve input from all three disciplines. For this reason, significant effort has been expended recently to foster collaborative multidisciplinary research in radiation oncology, with substantial demonstrated benefit.1-3 In light of these results, we endeavor here to adopt this “team‐science” approach to the traditional debates featured in this journal. This article is part of a series of special debates entitled “Three Discipline Collaborative Radiation Therapy (3DCRT)” in which each debate team will include a radiation oncologist, medical physicist, and radiobiologist. We hope that this format will not only be engaging for the readership but will also foster further collaboration in the science and clinical practice of radiation oncology.

中文翻译：

---

三学科协同放射治疗（3DCRT）专题争论：我们应该用大分割治疗所有癌症患者。

1 三学科协作放射治疗 (3DCRT) 辩论系列

放射肿瘤学是一门高度多学科的医学专业，主要借鉴三个科学学科——医学、物理学和生物学。因此，对放射肿瘤学实践中的争议或变化的讨论必须涉及所有三个学科的意见。因此，最近付出了巨大的努力来促进放射肿瘤学的多学科合作研究，并取得了显着的效益。 1-3鉴于这些结果，我们在此努力采用这种“团队科学”方法来解决本期刊中的传统辩论。本文是题为“三学科协作放射治疗（3DCRT）”系列特别辩论的一部分，每个辩论小组将包括一名放射肿瘤学家、医学物理学家和放射生物学家。我们希望这种形式不仅能吸引读者，还能促进放射肿瘤学科学和临床实践的进一步合作。