Stalemating the opponent in chess has given rise to various opinions as to the nature of that result and the reward it should properly receive. Here, following Lasker and Reti, we propose that ‘stalemate’ is a secondary goal, superior to a draw by agreement or rule – but inferior to mate. We report the work of ‘Aloril’ who has created endgame tables holding both ‘DTM’ depth to mate and ‘DTS’ depth to stalemate data, and who should be regarded as the prime author of this paper. Further, we look at the classification of ‘Chess Stalemate Studies’ in the context of a ‘Lasker Chess’ which recognises the stalemate goal.

中文翻译：

---

僵局和“DTS”深度使残局桌陷入僵局

在国际象棋中使对手陷入僵局已经引起了关于结果的性质以及它应该适当获得的奖励的各种意见。在这里，遵循 Lasker 和 Reti，我们提出“僵局”是次要目标，优于通过协议或规则进行的平局——但低于配对。我们报告了“Aloril”的工作，他创建了包含“DTM”交配深度和“DTS”深度相持数据的残局表，他应该被视为本文的主要作者。此外，我们在识别僵局目标的“拉斯克国际象棋”的背景下查看“国际象棋僵局研究”的分类。