New Phytologist225 (2020), 1788–1798, doi: 10.1111/nph.16251
Since its publication, the authors of Sudheeran et al. (2020) have brought to our attention an error in their article. The data in Fig. 5(a) were incorrectly presented with the values reversed. The correct Fig. 5 is shown below.
Fig. 5
Open in figure viewerPowerPoint
Characterization of volatiles from mango peel extracts treated with β‐glucosidase and their effects on Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. (a) Diameter of hyphal growth of C. gloeosporioides in the presence of volatiles from peel extracts treated (+), or not (−), with β‐glucosidase. (b) Representative picture of hyphal growth in (a). (c) Heatmap of concentrations of tentative volatile compounds of mango extracts of red fruit (RF) or green fruit (GF) peels from the red side (RS) or green side (GS) of the fruit treated, or not, with β‐glucosidase. (d) Concentrations of methyl salicylate, benzyl alcohol, and phenylacetaldehyde in peels treated, or not, with β‐glucosidase. Values are means ± SE of three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey–Kramer least significant difference tests.
京公网安备 11010802027423号