Abstract Contemporary global policy development is increasingly shaped through the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In parallel, the United Nations initiative on Global Geospatial Information Management (UN-GGIM) plays a leading role in the development and diffusion of policy frameworks with regard to geospatial information. Specifically, two frameworks, the Framework for Effective Land Administration (FELA) and the Strategic Framework for Geoinformation Services for Disaster (SFGISD), are under development to tackle global issues in relation to tenure security and natural disasters. In order to harmoniously diffuse those global goals and frameworks into national laws and regulations, and to local community initiatives and policies, policy transfer is required to occur between governance layers. This paper seeks to assess ‘whether’ and ‘how’ this policy transfer occurs, focusing specifically on identifying limitations and its opportunities for its enhancement. Results reveal that the approach so far used for policy transfer is taking conventional institutional means to do this in both domains land administration and disaster risk management (DRM) domains. There appears to be an opportunity to utilize a networked approach instead of the conventional institutional for a more robust and further-reaching uptake of the policies. This could also give space to provide better mechanisms for feeding results from local level initiatives and successes into the global frameworks.

中文翻译：

---

土地管理和灾害风险管理的全球政策转移

摘要 当代全球政策发展越来越多地通过可持续发展目标 (SDG) 来塑造。与此同时，联合国全球地理空间信息管理倡议（UN-GGIM）在地理空间信息政策框架的制定和传播方面发挥着主导作用。具体而言，正在制定两个框架，即有效土地管理框架 (FELA) 和灾害地理信息服务战略框架 (SFGISD)，以解决与权属安全和自然灾害相关的全球问题。为了将这些全球目标和框架和谐地融入国家法律法规以及当地社区倡议和政策，需要在治理层之间进行政策转移。本文旨在评估这种政策转移“是否”和“如何”发生，特别侧重于确定局限性及其增强机会。结果表明，迄今为止用于政策转移的方法是采用传统的制度手段在土地管理和灾害风险管理 (DRM) 领域实现这一目标。似乎有机会利用网络方法而不是传统的制度来更有效和更广泛地采纳这些政策。这也可以为提供更好的机制提供空间，将地方层面的举措和成功的成果纳入全球框架。结果表明，迄今为止用于政策转移的方法是采用传统的制度手段在土地管理和灾害风险管理 (DRM) 领域实现这一目标。似乎有机会利用网络方法而不是传统的制度来更有效和更广泛地采纳这些政策。这也可以为提供更好的机制提供空间，将地方层面的举措和成功的成果纳入全球框架。结果表明，迄今为止用于政策转移的方法是采用传统的制度手段在土地管理和灾害风险管理 (DRM) 领域实现这一目标。似乎有机会利用网络方法而不是传统的制度来更有效和更广泛地采纳这些政策。这也可以为提供更好的机制提供空间，将地方层面的举措和成功的成果纳入全球框架。