Typification of the names Antirrhinum barrelieri Boreau, A. controversum Pau and A. litigiosum Pau (Antirrhineae, Plantaginaceae) is needed to clarify the use and concept of these three names. The origin of a misinterpretation of the name A. barrelieri, which conditioned the subsequent use of these three names, is discussed. The previous ‘lectotype’ of A. barrelieri designated by Rothmaler from a Barrelier's illustration is shown to be ineffective, being contrary to Art. 9.12 of the ICN, and therefore a lectotype is designated from a syntype preserved in the herbarium of the Muséum des sciences naturelles d'Angers (France) at ANG. The Pau's names A. controversum and A. litigiosum have not been typified before, and lectotypes are here designated from specimens preserved at P and MA, respectively. As a consequence, the name A. litigiosum should be treated as a later heterotypic synonym of A. barrelieri.

中文翻译：

---

金鱼草中三个名字的代表（车前草科：金鱼草）

名字的典型化金鱼barrelieri Boreau，A. controversum加索尔和A. litigiosum需要加索尔（Antirrhineae，车前科）澄清这三个名称的使用和概念。讨论了对曲霉菌名称的误解的根源，这限制了这三个名称的后续使用。Rothmaler从Barrelier的插图中指定的以前的桶状曲霉“电型”被证明是无效的，与Art背道而驰。ICN的9.12 ，因此从ANG的昂热自然科学博物馆（法国）的植物标本室保存的同型体中指定了一个选型。保罗的名字引起争议以前没有对枯草芽孢杆菌（A. litigiosum）和立枯菌（A. litigiosum）进行过分型，此处分别从保存在P和MA的标本中指定了选型。因此，名字A. litigiosum应被视为更高异型代名词A. barrelieri。