Reports an error in "Identity confusion in complicated grief: A closer look" by Benjamin W. Bellet, Nicole J. LeBlanc, Marie-Christine Nizzi, Mikaela L. Carter, Florentine H. S. van der Does, Jacqueline Peters, Donald J. Robinaugh and Richard J. McNally (Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2020[May], Vol 129[4], 397-407). In the original article, the following acknowledgment of funding was missing from the author note: "Donald J. Robinaugh's work on this article was supported by federal funding from the National Institute of Mental Health (Grant 1K23MH113805-01A1; principal investigator: Donald J. Robinaugh)." The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2020-23551-001). Complicated grief (CG) is characterized by a wide range of symptoms, including identity confusion or a sense that a part of oneself has died with the decedent. Although identity confusion is a commonly reported feature of CG, little is known about which specific aspects of self-concept are compromised. In the current study, we used qualitative coding methods to investigate which aspects of the sense of self differed between those with and without CG in a sample of 77 bereaved adults. Relative to individuals without CG, those with CG provided fewer descriptors of their self-concept overall (lower self-fluency), provided sets of descriptors that consisted of fewer categories (lower self-diversity), and had lower proportions of self-relevant preferences and activities. However, group differences were not observed for proportions of any other categories of self-concept descriptors, including references to the loss, the past, or distress-related self-statements. Directions for future research and clinical implications are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

“复杂的悲伤中的身份混淆：仔细观察”：纠正。

Benjamin W. Bellet，Nicole J. LeBlanc，Marie-Christine Nizzi，Mikaela L. Carter，Florentine HS van der Did，Jacqueline Peters，Donald J. Robinaugh和理查德·麦克纳利（Richard J. McNally）（《异常心理学杂志》，2020年[5月]，第129卷[4]，397-407页）。在原始文章中，作者的注释中缺少以下对资助的承认：“唐纳德·J·罗宾纳夫在本文上的工作得到了美国国家心理健康研究所的联邦资助（赠款1K23MH113805-01A1；主要研究者：唐纳德·J。 Robinaugh）。” 本文的在线版本已得到纠正。（原始文章的以下摘要出现在记录2020-23551-001中）。复杂悲伤（CG）的特点是症状广泛，包括身份混淆或感觉自己的一部分已死于死者。尽管身份混淆是CG的普遍报道特征，但对自我概念的哪些特定方面受到损害的了解很少。在当前的研究中，我们使用定性编码方法调查了77名丧亲成人中有和没有CG者的自我感觉方面。相对于没有CG的个体，有CG的个体提供了较少的整体自我概念描述（较低的自我流利），提供了较少类别的描述（较低的自我多样性），并且具有较低的自我相关偏好比例和活动。但是，对于其他任何类别的自我概念描述符，包括对损失的提及，过去或与遇险有关的自我陈述。讨论了未来研究的方向和临床意义。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2020 APA，保留所有权利）。