The Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD) was recently developed to assess the ICD-11 model of personality disorders. The purpose of this study was to examine the construct validity of the PiCD using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) and the Computerized Adaptive Test of Personality Disorders Static Form (CAT-PD-SF). We administered these tests to 328 college students (150 males, 178 females). We found that the PiCD had adequate internal consistency reliability. Correlations between scores from the PiCD scales and the criterion measures generally indicated adequate discriminant validity. Along the same lines, convergent validity was adequate for the PiCD Negative Affective, Disinhibition, and Dissocial scales. However, the evidence was more mixed for the PiCD Detachment and Anankastic domains, which may be due to limitations with the content domains for these scales. Consistent with other research and theoretical expectations, a conjoint exploratory factor analysis utilizing the PiCD and MMPI-2-RF PSY-5 scales also indicated that anankastic and disinhibition may be more appropriately conceptualized as measuring opposite poles of one construct. Implications of these findings for the PiCD and the ICD-11 model are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

构造ICD-11（PiCD）个性清单的有效性：来自MMPI-2-RF和CAT-PD-SF的证据。

最近开发了ICD-11人格量表（PiCD）以评估人格障碍的ICD-11模型。这项研究的目的是使用明尼苏达州多相性人格量表（MMPI）-2-重组表（MMPI-2-RF）和人格障碍静态形式的计算机自适应测试（CAT-PD- SF）。我们对328名大学生（150名男性，178名女性）进行了这些测试。我们发现PiCD具有足够的内部一致性可靠性。PiCD量表的分数与标准量度之间的相关性通常表明有足够的判别效度。同样，对于PiCD负情感，抑制和反社会量表，收敛效度也足够。但是，关于PiCD分离和Anankastic域的证据更加混杂，这可能是由于这些比例尺的内容域受到限制所致。与其他研究和理论预期相一致，利用PiCD和MMPI-2-RF PSY-5量表进行的联合探索性因素分析也表明，anankastic和disinhibition可能更适合概念化地用于测量一个结构的相对极。讨论了这些发现对PiCD和ICD-11模型的影响。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2020 APA，保留所有权利）。讨论了这些发现对PiCD和ICD-11模型的影响。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2020 APA，保留所有权利）。讨论了这些发现对PiCD和ICD-11模型的影响。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2020 APA，保留所有权利）。