当前位置: X-MOL 学术Soil Biol. Biochem. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Using field-measured soil N2O fluxes and laboratory scale parameterization of N2O/(N2O+N2) ratios to quantify field-scale soil N2 emissions
Soil Biology and Biochemistry ( IF 9.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-06-22 , DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107904
Rui Wang , Zhanlei Pan , Xunhua Zheng , Xiaotang Ju , Zhisheng Yao , Klaus Butterbach-Bahl , Chong Zhang , Huanhuan Wei , Binxiang Huang

Soil dinitrogen (N2) emissions are a key nitrogen loss pathway of terrestrial ecosystems. However, the quantification of field N2 emissions from terrestrial ecosystems remains challenging, as sensitive field methods for measuring N2 fluxes are lacking. Here, we report a new approach to quantify field N2 emissions by (i) parameterizing the molar ratio of nitrous oxide (N2O) to N2O plus N2 emissions (RN2O) in the laboratory and (ii) measuring field N2O emissions and soil factors. Soil samples were taken from a maize field and incubated in the laboratory under simulated field conditions. Soil N2 and N2O emissions were determined using the gas-flow-soil-core method. The measurements revealed that the RN2O values were significantly higher (0.06–0.67) following urea fertilization and soil rewetting compared to those periods with no fertilization (0.03–0.08) (P < 0.01). A multivariate, nonlinear parameterization of RN2O against four easily measured soil factors (ammonia and nitrate concentrations, temperature, and moisture) (n = 20, r2 = 0.92, P < 0.001) was developed. The seasonal N2 emissions at the field scale were calculated by combining the laboratory-measured RN2O with the field-measured N2O emissions and the soil factors. Based on this approach, the cumulative emissions of N2 and N2+N2O for the maize season were 7.2 ± 2.8 and 9.6 ± 2.1 (standard error) kg N ha−1, respectively. Using a fixed RN2O, i.e., disregarding the temporal and spatial variability of RN2O, resulted in approximately 50%–70% lower estimates. Our study shows that a combination of field N2O and soil factors measurements and laboratory parameterization of RN2O allows field N2 emissions from croplands to be constrained. With additional measurements, including other soil properties, the development of a generalized parameterization of RN2O may become feasible. This approach would allow for a better understanding of gaseous N losses from agricultural ecosystems.



中文翻译:

使用现场测量的土壤N 2 O通量和实验室规模的N 2 O /(N 2 O + N 2)比参数化来量化现场规模的土壤N 2排放

土壤中的氮(N 2)排放是陆地生态系统的关键氮损失途径。但是,由于缺乏用于测量N 2通量的灵敏的野外方法,对来自陆地生态系统的野外N 2排放进行量化仍然具有挑战性。在这里,我们报告了一种通过(i)参数化一氧化二氮(N 2 O)与N 2 O的摩尔比加上N 2排放来量化场N 2排放的新方法([Rñ2Ø)在实验室中;以及(ii)测量田间N 2 O排放量和土壤因子。土壤样品取自玉米田,并在实验室中模拟田间条件下进行培养。土壤N 2和N 2 O的排放量是使用气流-土壤-岩心方法确定的。测量结果表明[Rñ2Ø与没有施肥的时期(0.03-0.08)相比,施肥和土壤湿润后的尿素含量值(0.06-0.67)显着更高(P  <0.01)。的多元非线性参数化[Rñ2Ø针对四个易于测量的土壤因素(氨和硝酸盐浓度,温度和湿度)(n  = 20,r 2  = 0.92,P  <0.001)进行了研究。野外尺度的季节性N 2排放量是通过结合实验室测量得出的[Rñ2Ø结合实地测量的N 2 O排放量和土壤因子。基于此方法,玉米季节的N 2和N 2 + N 2 O累积排放分别为7.2±2.8和9.6±2.1(标准误)kg N ha -1。使用固定[Rñ2Ø,即忽略了时间和空间的可变性 [Rñ2Ø,导致估算值降低了约50%–70%。我们的研究表明,田间N 2 O和土壤因子测量以及实验室参数化的结合[Rñ2Ø可以限制农田的农田N 2排放。通过其他测量,包括其他土壤特性,开发了广义的参数化[Rñ2Ø可能变得可行。这种方法将使人们更好地了解农业生态系统中气态氮的损失。

更新日期:2020-06-22
down
wechat
bug