ABSTRACT Different environmental control types (background heating, electric and wet humidistatic heating, dehumidification and air-conditioning) have been assessed in more than 60 historic buildings. Performance in terms of climate and corrosion rates achieved, and energy consumption, were measured. An intensive series of trials compared dehumidification and humidistatic heating for stores. Damage to the wall surfaces and surface evaporation rates were measured. The impact of two types of evaporation rate equipment on surface temperatures and airflows was assessed. Humidistatic heating was found to generate a greater distribution in temperature and relative humidity across the room. It also caused increased surface damage rates in buildings with sulphate salts. The surface evaporation rates and energy used were lower for dehumidification.

中文翻译：

---

历史建筑环境控制策略比较

摘要 在 60 多座历史建筑中评估了不同的环境控制类型（背景加热、电和湿式恒湿加热、除湿和空调）。测量了气候和腐蚀速率方面的性能，以及能源消耗。一系列密集的试验比较了商店的除湿和恒湿加热。测量壁表面的损坏和表面蒸发率。评估了两种蒸发速率设备对表面温度和气流的影响。发现恒湿加热在整个房间内产生更大的温度和相对湿度分布。它还导致含有硫酸盐的建筑物的表面损坏率增加。用于除湿的表面蒸发率和能量较低。