Evaluation metrics using climate-based daylight modelling paradigms have become the de-facto standard in work environments but have only limited applicability in residential architecture. Qualities of daylight cited in the architectural design literature, such as daily and seasonal availability of daylight as well as access to direct sunlight, are simulated in detail but are usually overlooked in the commonly used evaluation metrics. In a recent paper, a new climate-based, annual daylight evaluation framework called the residential daylight score has been proposed for cold and temperate climates. It assesses daylight autonomy and access to direct light in 12 daily and seasonal bins and proposes targets for seasonal and diurnal daylight autonomy and duration of direct sunlight exposure. While the metric aims to capture essential characteristics of residential daylight, only a few reference cases exist in the literature to adequately judge its achievability and applicability. This paper aims to thoroughly test the residential daylight score and provide reference cases for 2444 apartments from a set of 18 multifamily buildings that compare the new metric with currently used climate-based metrics.

中文翻译：

---

测试住宅日光得分：比较温带气候下 2444 个独立住宅单元的基于气候的采光指标

使用基于气候的日光建模范式的评估指标已成为工作环境中的事实上的标准，但在住宅建筑中的适用性有限。建筑设计文献中引用的日光质量，例如日光的每日和季节性可用性以及直射阳光的获取，都经过详细模拟，但通常在常用的评估指标中被忽略。在最近的一篇论文中，针对寒冷和温带气候提出了一种新的基于气候的年度日光评估框架，称为住宅日光评分。它评估了 12 个每日和季节性垃圾箱中的日光自主性和直射光的获取情况，并提出了季节性和昼夜日光自主性以及阳光直射持续时间的目标。虽然该指标旨在捕捉住宅日光的基本特征，但文献中仅存在少数参考案例来充分判断其可实现性和适用性。本文旨在彻底测试住宅日光得分，并为 18 座多户住宅建筑中的 2444 套公寓提供参考案例，将新指标与当前使用的基于气候的指标进行比较。