RFC 5180, the IPv6 update of RFC 2544, declared IPv6 transition technologies out of its scope. RFC 8219 defined a benchmarking methodology for IPv6 transition technologies including stateless NAT64 (more properly called SIIT) in the category of single translation solutions. Whereas several research papers have dealt with the performance of different stateful NAT64 implementations, none of them used RFC 8219 compliant measurements or addressed stateless NAT64 implementations. In this paper, we show, how stateless NAT64 implementations can be benchmarked carrying out the most important tests recommended by RFC 8219 without a special purpose NAT64 Tester, using simply an RFC 2544/RFC 5180 compliant legacy Tester. We carry out benchmarking measurements to examine the performance of three free software NAT64 implementations, namely: Jool, TAYGA and map646. All the details of our measurements are disclosed and their results are presented in the paper.

RFC 5180是RFC 2544的IPv6更新，宣布IPv6过渡技术不在其范围之内。RFC 8219为IPv6过渡技术定义了一种基准测试方法，该技术包括单翻译解决方案类别中的无状态NAT64（更恰当地称为SIIT）。尽管有几篇研究论文讨论了不同的有状态NAT64实现的性能，但没有一篇使用RFC 8219兼容的度量标准或无状态的NAT64实现。在本文中，我们展示了如何仅使用符合RFC 2544 / RFC 5180的旧式测试器，就可以对无状态NAT64实现进行基准测试，以执行RFC 8219建议的最重要测试，而无需专用NAT64测试器。我们进行基准测试，以检查三种免费软件NAT64实现的性能，即：Jool，TAYGA和map646。我们测量的所有细节均已披露，其结果也已在本文中介绍。