当前位置: X-MOL 学术Pain Pract. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Longevity and Utilization Cost of Rechargeable and Non-Rechargeable Spinal Cord Stimulation Implants: A Comparative Study.
Pain Practice ( IF 2.5 ) Pub Date : 2020-06-15 , DOI: 10.1111/papr.12926
Shrif Costandi 1, 2 , Nagy Mekhail 1, 2 , Gerges Azer 1, 2 , Diana Sue Mehanny 1 , Demiana Hanna 1 , Yustina Salma 1 , Robert Bolash 1, 2 , Youssef Saweris 1, 2
Affiliation  

Despite major advancements in features and capabilities of the implantable pulse generator (IPG), real‐life longevity and cost‐effectiveness studies to guide pain specialists to make the appropriate choice between rechargeable and non‐rechargeable IPG are limited. Our study aimed to compare the longevity and cost effectiveness of rechargeable vs. non‐rechargeable IPG and SCS systems.

中文翻译:

可充电和不可充电脊髓刺激植入物的寿命和使用成本:比较研究。

尽管植入脉冲发生器(IPG)的特点和能力具有重大进步,但实际寿命和成本效益研究,以指导疼痛专家在充电和非充电IPG之间进行适当的选择是有限的。我们的研究旨在比较可充电与不可充电 IPG 和 SCS 系统的寿命和成本效益。
更新日期:2020-06-15
down
wechat
bug