当前位置: X-MOL 学术Comput. Law Secur. Rev. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Utilising AI in the legal assistance sector—Testing a role for legal information institutes
Computer Law & Security Review ( IF 3.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-06-13 , DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105407
Andrew Mowbray , Philip Chung , Graham Greenleaf

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in law has again become of great interest to lawyers and government. Legal Information Institutes (LIIs) have played a significant role in the provision of legal information via the web. The concept of ‘free access to law’ is not static, and the evolution of its principles now requires a response from providers of free access to legal information (‘a LII response’) to this renewed prominence of AI. This should include improving and expanding free access to legal advice. This paper proposes, and proposes to test, one approach that LIIs might take in the use of AI (specifically, ‘decision support’ or ‘intelligent assistance’ (IA) technologies), an approach that leverages the very large legal information assets that some LIIs have built over the past two decades. This approach focuses on how LIIs can assist providers of free legal advice (the ‘legal assistance sector’) to serve their clients. We consider the constraints that the requirement of ‘free’ imposes (on both the legal assistance sector and on LIIs), including on what types of free legal advice systems are sustainable, and what roles LIIs may realistically play in the development of such a ‘commons of free legal advice’. We suggest guidelines for development of such systems. The AI-related services and tools that the Australasian Legal Information Institute (AustLII) is providing (the ‘DataLex’ platform), and how they could be used to achieve these goals, are outlined.



中文翻译:

在法律援助部门中利用人工智能-测试法律信息机构的作用

在法律中使用人工智能(AI)再次引起了律师和政府的极大兴趣。法律信息学院(LII)在通过网络提供法律信息方面发挥了重要作用。“自由获得法律”的概念不是一成不变的,其原理的发展现在需要自由获得法律信息的提供者做出的回应(“ LII回应”),以重新体现人工智能。这应包括改善和扩大免费获得法律咨询的机会。本文提出并提议测试一种LII可能会在AI中使用的方法(特别是“决策支持”或“智能协助”(IA)技术),该方法利用了一些LII在过去的二十年中已经建立。这种方法侧重于LII如何协助免费法律咨询提供者(“法律援助部门”)为他们的客户提供服务。我们考虑了“自由”要求的约束(包括法律援助部门和LII),包括哪些类型的免费法律咨询系统是可持续的,以及LII在开发此类“自由”中可能实际发挥的作用。免费法律咨询的共同点”。我们建议开发此类系统的准则。概述了澳大利亚法律信息研究所(AustLII)提供的与AI相关的服务和工具(“ DataLex”平台),以及如何使用它们来实现这些目标。我们考虑了“自由”要求的约束(包括法律援助部门和LII),包括哪些类型的免费法律咨询系统是可持续的,以及LII在开发此类“自由”中可能实际发挥的作用。免费法律咨询的共同点”。我们建议开发此类系统的准则。概述了澳大利亚法律信息研究所(AustLII)提供的与AI相关的服务和工具(“ DataLex”平台),以及如何使用它们来实现这些目标。我们考虑了“自由”要求的约束(包括法律援助部门和LII),包括哪些类型的免费法律咨询系统是可持续的,以及LII在开发此类“自由”中可能实际发挥的作用。免费法律咨询的共同点”。我们建议开发此类系统的准则。概述了澳大利亚法律信息研究所(AustLII)提供的与AI相关的服务和工具(“ DataLex”平台),以及如何将其用于实现这些目标。

更新日期:2020-06-13
down
wechat
bug