当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Can standardized measures provide helpful feedback about adult protective services substantiation? Pilot data from a short self-neglect assessment.
Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect ( IF 1.6 ) Pub Date : 2020-04-03 , DOI: 10.1080/08946566.2020.1742837
Pi-Ju Liu 1 , Sara K Stratton 2 , Zachary Hass 3 , Kendon J Conrad 4
Affiliation  

Can standardized assessment contribute to improving Adult Protective Services (APS) practice? In this exploratory study, San Francisco and Napa APS utilized a newly developed short self-neglect assessment to test how standardized measures provide information for substantiation decision making. Findings demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity for the short self-neglect assessment, and analyses revealed important issues that could improve practice. Review of outliers revealed: (1) problems using the assessment tool, (2) misunderstandings of APS procedures, and (3) struggles navigating the case management system. These revelations could all be easily addressed in training. Caseworker's clinical judgment and experience also continue to have a place in complementing the use of the standardized assessment.

中文翻译:

标准化措施能否提供有关成人防护服务证实的有用反馈?通过简短的自我忽视评估获得的试验数据。

标准化评估可以有助于改善成人保护服务(APS)的做法吗?在这项探索性研究中,旧金山和纳帕APS利用了新开发的短期自我忽视评估来测试标准化措施如何为实证决策提供信息。调查结果表明,对于简短的自我忽视评估,其信度和效度令人满意,而分析则揭示了可以改善实践的重要问题。异常值的审查显示:(1)使用评估工具的问题;(2)对APS程序的误解;(3)难以解决案件管理系统。这些启示都可以在培训中轻松解决。案例工作者的临床判断和经验在补充标准评估的使用方面也继续占有一席之地。
更新日期:2020-04-03
down
wechat
bug