Reports an error in "The new normal: Changes in drinking norms from college to postcollege life" by Hannah R. Hamilton, Stephen Armeli, Mark Litt and Howard Tennen (Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, Advanced Online Publication, Feb 10, 2020, np). In the article, the description of the prospective sample in the second sentence of the second paragraph and the second sentence of the third paragraph of the Participants section is incorrect. The description should appear, respectively, as follows: These were participants who were contacted if they reported at least one heavy drinking day (≥4 drinks for women and ≥5 drinks for men) in both a 30-day retrospective assessment and a 30-day daily diary reporting phase at Wave 1. . . . Of these, 1,141 were identified as moderate to heavy drinkers. Due to a coding error, 23 of these individuals did not meet these criteria but were contacted for Wave 2. However, all of these individuals reported drinking levels at Wave 1 (using a drinking composite comprised of standardized retrospective and daily diary drinking variables) within the range of values for the individuals who met the correct criteria. All were retained for analysis and 906 (79%) completed at least 15 days of recording in Wave 2.² (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2020-08980-001.) Despite the wealth of research on the effects of drinking norms on college students' alcohol consumption, researchers have not yet examined changes in drinking norms and their association with drinking level after students leave the college environment. The current study filled this gap by following students into postcollege life, measuring drinking norms and daily drinking behavior. College students (N = 1,848) were recruited to take part in a daily diary study measuring social and solitary alcohol consumption, and 1,142 moderate to heavy drinkers from the college cohort were invited to complete a second wave of daily diaries 5 years later, with 906 providing at least 15 days of diary data in each wave. Results of multilevel modeling analyses suggest that family injunctive drinking norms become more strongly related to alcohol consumption after individuals leave college. In contrast, institutional injunctive norms may have a greater limiting effect among college students (i.e., the association was greater among college students) and the relations between friend injunctive and descriptive norms to drinking behavior did not change between waves in the current study. This suggests that friend drinking continues to be related to own drinking behavior among adults after leaving the college environment, and highlights the changing importance of institutional norms and family approval. These results may have implications for intervening in young adults' heavy drinking. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

对Hamilton，Armeli，Litt和Tennen的更正（2020）。

Hannah R. Hamilton，Stephen Armeli，Mark Litt和Howard Tennen在“新常态：从大学到大学生活后饮酒规范的变化”中报告了错误（上瘾行为心理学，高级在线出版物，2020年2月10日，np） 。在这篇文章中，参与者部分第二段第二句和第三段第二句中的预期样本描述不正确。说明应分别如下所示：在30天的回顾性评估和30天的回顾性评估中，如果报告至少饮酒一天（女性≥4杯酒，男性≥5杯酒），则与这些参与者进行了接触。第一波的每日日记报告阶段。。。在这些人中，有1141人被确定为中度至重度饮酒者。由于编码错误，这些人中有23个人不符合这些标准，但被联系到了Wave2。但是，所有这些人都报告了Wave 1的饮酒水平（使用包括标准化回顾性和每日日记饮酒变量的饮酒组合），处于该值范围内。符合正确条件的个人。所有样本均保留进行分析，并且906（79％）人在Wave2²中至少完成了15天的录音（原始文章的以下摘要出现在2020-08980-001记录中。）饮酒规范对大学生饮酒的影响，研究人员尚未研究饮酒规范的变化以及学生离开大学环境后与饮酒水平的关系。当前的研究通过跟随学生进入大学后生活来填补了这一空白，测量饮酒规范和日常饮酒行为。招募了大学生（N = 1,848）参加每日日记研究，以测量社会和单独饮酒的情况，并邀请了1,142名来自大学队列的中度至重度饮酒者，在5年后完成了第二次每日日记，共906人每波至少提供15天的日记数据。多级模型分析的结果表明，个人禁制大学后，家庭禁令性饮酒规范与饮酒之间的关系更加密切。相反，机构禁令在大学生中可能具有更大的限制作用（即大学生之间的关联更大），并且在当前研究中，朋友禁令和描述性准则与饮酒行为之间的关系在各波之间没有变化。这表明离开大学环境后，成年人的朋友饮酒仍然与自己的饮酒行为有关，并突出了制度规范和家庭认可的重要性的变化。这些结果可能对干预年轻人的大量饮酒有影响。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2020 APA，保留所有权利）。