American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and other Dementias ( IF 2.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-06-08 , DOI: 10.1177/1533317520925333 Amandine Mayelle 1 , Mohamad El Haj 2, 3, 4 , Pascal Antoine 1
Objectives:
Assessments of unawareness in Alzheimer’s disease mainly focus on the objects (the “what”) of unawareness. A recent person-centered approach proposes to also assess the processes (the “how”). The present study combines 2 approaches to understand this heterogeneity in assessments of unawareness.
Method:
We recruited 46 participants from 8 nursing homes. They underwent a semi-structured interview and were assessed using a prediction–performance paradigm. Spearman correlations were calculated, and generalized additive models were established.
Results:
The 2 approaches are associated through cognitive deficits, confrontation with difficulties and identity changes. Objects (the what), mechanisms, and modes of expression (the how) explain at least 29.6% of the variance of unawareness.
Conclusions:
Unawareness is more than simply being unaware of something; it is a synergy between the objects and processes of arousal and expression. Moreover, unawareness extends beyond the disease to include the self. Considering the entire person seems to be necessary.
中文翻译:
“什么”和“如何”:通过两种观点的结合来理解阿尔茨海默病的无意识的新视角。
目标:
对阿尔茨海默病无意识的评估主要集中在无意识的对象(“什么”)上。最近以人为本的方法还建议评估流程(“如何”)。本研究结合了两种方法来理解无意识评估中的这种异质性。
方法:
我们从 8 家疗养院招募了 46 名参与者。他们接受了半结构化访谈,并使用预测绩效范式进行评估。计算Spearman相关性,并建立广义相加模型。
结果:
这两种方法通过认知缺陷、面对困难和身份改变相关联。对象(什么)、机制和表达方式(如何)至少解释了 29.6% 的无意识差异。
结论:
无意识不仅仅是不知道某事;它是唤醒和表达的对象和过程之间的协同作用。此外,无意识不仅限于疾病,还包括自我。考虑到整个人似乎是必要的。